摘要
神道之间的关系在玄学派易学中经历了神道合一、神道分离并最终同一化的过程,这个理论历程深刻影响了后世易学对于神的地位及其与道之间关系的理解,时至今日,神在易学乃至中国哲学系统中没有得到与其地位相匹配的研究,一门“中国神学”至今仍然阙如。运用现象学方法,我们发现,玄学派易学已经展现了神道关系处于一种既不能同一又不能不同一的困境,究其原因,是玄学思维范式的限制。根据《易传》和玄学派易学的相关思考对神与阴阳、太极和道之间的关系进行现象学分析,神与太极的同一性关系、神与道的意向性关系、神的“感—知”和感通、可测与不可测等特性及其运行方式都能得到清晰的阐明。
In the Yi Jing(I Ching,《易经》) studies of the Xuan xue(metaphysical,玄学) school,the relationship between shen(spirit or deity,神)and dao(tao,道)underwent a historical evolution,from unity to separation,and ultimately to a form of reintegration.This theoretical progression deeply influenced later interpretations of the status of shen within Yi Jing scholarship and its relation to dao.Even today,shen remains underexplored in both Yi Jing studies and the broader framework of Chinese philosophy.A comprehensive discipline of Zhong guo shen xue(Chinese theology,中国神学)is still conspicuously absent.By applying a phenomenological approach,we find that the xuan xue interpretation of the Yi Jing reveals a paradoxical relationship between shen and dao-one that is neither identical nor entirely distinct.This dilemma stems from the inherent limitations of the Xuan xue paradigm itself.Through a phenomenological analysis of the Yi Zhuan(Commentary on the Yijing,《易传》)and related Xuan xue thought,the relationships between shen and yin-yang,tai ji(tai chi,太极),and dao can be elucidated.In particular,the identity between shen and tai ji,the intentionality between shen and dao,shen's capacity for"affective knowing""and resonance,measurability and immeasurability,and modes of operation,can all be clearly articulated.
出处
《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》
北大核心
2025年第3期44-55,157,158,共14页
Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
