期刊文献+

人工智能素养的内涵、结构和评价体系 被引量:8

Artificial Intelligence Literacy:Connotation,Framework,and Evaluation System
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]为改变人工智能素养的评价缺乏实测研究的现状,针对人工智能素养,梳理其内涵、分析其结构、设计其评价体系,并进行科学性检验,以期为人工智能素养的测量和提升创制一个量化工具。[方法/过程]首先,梳理、提炼人工智能素养的内涵,明确以人工智能意识、人工智能知识、人工智能能力和人工智能伦理为主要维度的人工智能素养结构框架;进而,依据一定原则设计出包含多层级指标和量表问项的人工智能素养评价体系;最后,对871名高中生开展素养水平实测,采用熵权法确定各级指标的权重,通过统计分析和现状印证,对评价体系进行科学性检验。[结果/结论]在人工智能素养框架中,人工智能意识是先导、人工智能知识是基础、人工智能能力是核心、人工智能伦理是保障。设计的人工智能素养评价指标的权重具有较高的一致性,测评量表具有较好的信度和效度,评价体系具有显著的合理性。 [Purpose/Significance]Due to the lack of practical research on the evaluation of artificial intelligence literacy,this article sorts out the connotation of artificial intelligence literacy,analyzes its structure,designs and tests the evaluation system,attempting to create a quantitative tool for measuring and improving artificial intelligence literacy.[Method/Process]This article summarized and refined the connotation of artificial intelligence literacy.It proposed that the main dimensions of the structural framework included artificial intelligent consciousness,artificial intelligent knowledge,artificial intelligent ability,and artificial intelligent ethics.Furthermore,it designed an artificial intelligence literacy evaluation system that included multi-level indicators and scale items based on certain principles.Finally,a literacy level measurement was conducted among 871 high school students.It adopted the entropy weight method to determine the weights of various indicators.Through statistical analysis and current verification,it tested the scientific validity of the evaluation system.[Result/Conclusion]In the framework of artificial intelligence literacy,artificial intelligent consciousness is the premise,artificial intelligent knowledge is the foundation,artificial intelligent ability is the core,and artificial intelligent ethics is the guarantee.The weights of the artificial intelligence literacy evaluation indicators designed in this article have high consistency,the evaluation scale has good reliability and validity,and the evaluation system has significant rationality.
作者 赵益民 彭雪琴 寸国美 Zhao Yimin;Peng Xueqin;Cun Guomei(Library of Yunnan Normal University,Kunming 650500;School of History and Archives,Yunnan University,Kunming 650091)
出处 《图书情报工作》 北大核心 2025年第13期83-93,共11页 Library and Information Service
关键词 人工智能素养 结构框架 评价指标 实测检验 artificial intelligence literacy structural framework evaluation index actual testing
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献229

共引文献973

同被引文献68

引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部