期刊文献+

数智时代科研诚信及出版伦理 被引量:3

Research on Integrity and Publication Ethics in the Digital-Intelligent Era
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 科研诚信是科学探索的基石,数智时代更应加强科研诚信和出版伦理建设。科研诚信与出版伦理在目标设定、互为支撑、内容交叉以及动态协同发展等维度联系紧密。数智时代科研诚信及出版伦理面临的困境,诸如法规政策适配滞后、行业自律与监管存在漏洞、学术评价体系严重扭曲、道德教育严重缺位等状况。应构建多主体协同治理机制,涵盖制定针对性政策、完善行业监督体系、规范学术评价体系建设等举措,以此有效应对新挑战,护航科研与出版的健康发展。 Research integrity is the cornerstone of scientific exploration,and the construction of scientific research integrity and publishing ethics should be strengthened in the era of digital intelligence.Research integrity and publication ethics are closely related in the dimensions of goal setting,mutual support,content intersection and dynamic collaborative development.The dilemma faced by research integrity and publishing ethics in the era of digital intelligence,such as the lag of regulatory and policy adaptation,loopholes in industry self-discipline and supervision,serious distortion of academic evaluation system,and serious absence of moral education.A multiagent collaborative governance mechanism should be constructed,covering the formulation of targeted policies,improving the industry supervision system,and standardizing the construction of the academic evaluation system,so as to effectively respond to new challenges and escort the healthy development of scientific research and publication.
作者 郑芬芳 ZHENG Fenfang(Guangdong Association of Science and Science and Technology Management Research,Editorial Department of “Science and Technology Management Research”,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510033)
出处 《昌吉学院学报》 2025年第2期63-70,共8页 Journal of Changji University
基金 广东省科学技术期刊编辑学会基金项目“新质生产力视角下科技期刊优秀编辑培养策略研究”(2024-YB-23)阶段性研究成果。
关键词 数智时代 科研诚信 出版伦理 协同治理 the era of digital intelligence research integrity publication ethics collaborative governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献20

  • 1李舒沁,王灏晨,汪寿阳.人工智能背景下制造业劳动力结构影响研究——以工业机器人发展为例[J].管理评论,2021,33(3):307-314. 被引量:45
  • 2侯玉波,朱滢.文化对中国人思维方式的影响[J].心理学报,2002,34(1):106-111. 被引量:118
  • 3王恩界,乐国安.东西方文化背景下的道德观差异——来自于文化心理学视角的分析[J].道德与文明,2006(2):52-56. 被引量:9
  • 442 C. F.R. Part 50. subpart A :August 8,1989.
  • 5National Science Foundation (1991) : Misconduct in Science and Engineering: Final Rule. Federal Register 56( May 14) :22286 - 22290.
  • 6Kenneth D. Pimple. Defining Misconduct in Science : Some Reflections on the American Experience, http://www. indiana. edu/poynter/tre4 - 2a. html
  • 7Kenneth J. Ryan. Report of Commission on Research Integrity: Integrity and Misconduct in Research. November 3, 1995, pages 2, 1. U. S. Department of Health and Human Service. Pulic Health Service. http ://ori. dhhs. gov/documents/report-commission. pdf.
  • 8Kenneth J. Ryan. Report of Commission on Research Integrity: Integrity and Misconduct in Research. November 3, 1995, pages 15. U. S. Department of Health and Human Service. Pulie Health Service. http ://ori. dhhs. gov/doeuments/report-eommission. pdf.
  • 9Kenneth J. Ryan. Report of Commission on Research Integrity: Integrity and Misconduct in Research. November 3, 1995, pages 15-17. U. S. Department of Health and Human Service. Pulie Health Service. http ://ori. dhhs. gov/doeuments/report-eommission. pdf.
  • 10Ralph A. Bradshaw. FASEB Letter to Donna Sha/a/a 7.2.96. http://www .faseb. org/opa/hhslet2. html( 1 of 3) 12/21/2005 11:27 : 16 AM

共引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部