摘要
预防性环境民事公益诉讼制度承载着风险防控的价值理念,在环境保护的法治建设中被寄予重大期望。该类诉讼的启动以“重大风险”的认定为前提,但由于当前司法实践中“重大风险”的认定呈现出认定范式尚未统一以及司法者能动性不足的实践样态,无益于该制度的落地实效。“重大风险”的内涵不明、证明责任的规则阙如及传统司法观念与新制度间的非契合性已然成为该制度的病灶。因而,有必要通过厘清“重大风险”概念内涵、完善实然法上的证明责任制度、弥合传统司法观念与新制度之间罅隙,真正发挥预防性环境民事公益诉讼的前端预防优势。
The preventive environmental civil public interest litigation system embodies the value of risk prevention and is highly anticipated in the construction of the rule of law in environmental protection.However,since the initiation of such litigation is premised on the existence of"significant risk,"current judicial practice shows a lack of a unified identification paradigm and insufficient judicial initiative,which hinders the effective implementation of the system.The unclear connotation of"significant risk,"the absence of proof burden rules,and the mismatch between traditional judicial concepts and the new system have become the maladies.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the connotation of"significant risk,"construct the proof burden system in positive law,and bridge the gap between traditional judicial concepts and the new system to truly leverage the preventive advantages of preventive environmental civil public interest litigation.
作者
姜春洪
张硕
Jiang Chunhong;Zhang Shuo(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050,China)
出处
《河北环境工程学院学报》
CAS
2024年第4期9-14,共6页
Journal of Hebei University of Environmental Engineering
关键词
预防性环境民事公益诉讼
重大风险
司法认定
preventive environmental civil public interest litigation
significant risk
judicial deter-mination
