摘要
所有在内涵和外延处于不确定状态的法律概念均可称之为不确定法律概念。由于不确定法律概念在概念的内涵和外延上具有模糊性的特点,因此对此类概念的法律适用将陷入"事实问题与法律问题"的模糊区域。在此模糊区域之中,上下审级法院之间所形成的功能分野陷入困境,下级法院对法律概念的判断仍应享有一定的自由评价空间,第三审法院对此评价空间应予以尊重。司法判例中所形成的"概念认识错误-是否对所有重要性事实审查穷尽-是否违反经验法则或具有可责问的违反程序性事项"的有限审查及其少数无限审查的例外,共同构成不确定法律概念的司法审查原则。
Any legal concept which is uncertain both in connotation and in denotation can be referred to as an uncertain legal concept. As the connotation and the denotation are unclear for the uncertain legal concept, thus it would fall into a vague state in which the distinction between the question of fact and the question of law becomes complicated and confusing when such concept is applied. In such a vague state, the separated roles of the higher court and the lower court may goes into a predicament. The lower court should have a certain level of the discretion, and the third instance should respect such discretion. The limited review of ＂misunderstanding of the concept, whether or not all the facts of importance are exhaustively reviewed, and whether or not violate the empirical rule or have irregularities in the proceedings＂, together with unlimited review in exceptional ca- ses, constitute the principles of judicial review for the uncertain legal concept.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第6期146-157,共12页
Modern Law Science
关键词
不确定法律概念
逻辑区分
司法统一
uncertain legal concept
logical distinction
uniform adjudication
