期刊文献+

美国教师专业标准的功能定位及其背景与动因 被引量:4

The Functional Orientation of American Teacher Professional Standards and Its Context and Motive
原文传递
导出
摘要 标准的功能定位是影响教师标准价值实现的关键因素。而教师标准应该如何进行功能定位不可抽象而论,应置于特定的时空环境中加以审视。在提升教育质量成为压倒性诉求、以问责制为主导话语的教育改革时代,美国却选择了发展导向的教师标准。美国之所以作出如此选择,背后有着教师地位不高进而影响教师供给的客观背景,职业专业主义的思想背景以及分权制背景下美国联邦政府期望透过发展导向教师标准干预教师质量提升的主观考量。 The functional orientation of standards is a key factor influencing the realization of the value of teacher standards.How teacher standards should be functionally oriented cannot be discussed in the abstract,but should be examined in a specific temporal and spatial context.In the era of education reform,in which improving the quality of education has become the overriding demand and accountability is the dominant discourse,the United States has chosen to adopt development-oriented teacher standards.The objective background of the low status of teachers,which in turn affects the supply of teachers,the ideological background of professionalism,and the subjective considerations of the federal government's desire to intervene in the improvement of teacher quality through development-oriented teacher standards in the context of decentralization are the reasons for the United States to make such a choice.
作者 王静 饶从满 吴宗劲 WANG Jing;RAO Congman;WU Zongjin(Institute of International and Comparative Education,Northeast Normal University,Changchun 130024,China)
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第5期3-17,共15页 Studies in Foreign Education
基金 国家社会科学基金“十三五”规划2019年度教育学重点课题“新时代教师专业标准研究”(项目编号:AFA190007)。
关键词 美国 教师 专业标准 功能定位 教师质量 United States teachers professional standards functional orientation teacher quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献19

  • 1教育部关于深人推进教育管办评分离促进政府职能转变的若干意见[EB/OL]. (2015 - 05 - 04)[2016 - 03 - 26]. http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlf iles/ moe/ s7049/201505/186927.html.
  • 2Rice, Jennifer King.Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes [ M ]. Washington, DC : Economic Policy Institute, 2003 : 5.
  • 3Linda Darling-Hammond. Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evi- dence [EB/OL]. [2015-12-23].http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/LDH_1999.pdf.
  • 4DeLacy Derin Ganley. Raising the Bar of Teacher Quality: Accountability, Collaboration, and So- cial Justice [ EB/OL ]. [ 2015-10-12 ].http ://files.eric.ed.gov/fulhext/EJ813759.pdf.
  • 5Linda Darling-Hammond. Accountability for professional practice [ J ]. Teachers CollegeRecord, 1989, ( 1 ) : 59-80.
  • 6Linda Darling-Hammond. America's Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future [J]. The Phi Delta Kappan,2010, (4) : 8-14.
  • 7Linda Darling-Hammond.Teacher Professionalism and Accountability [J ]. The Education Digest, 1989, (1) : 15-19.
  • 8Linda Darling-Hammond, Wilhoit, G. & Pittenger, L.. Accountability for college and career readiness: Developing a new paradigm [J]. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2014, (22) : 1-38.
  • 9Conley, D.. Getting ready for college, careers, and the Common Core: What every educator needs to know [ M ]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2013 : 8.
  • 10Linda Darling- Hammond. A Proposal for Evaluation in the Teaching Profession [ J ]. The Elementary School Journal, 1986, (4) :530-551.

共引文献38

同被引文献119

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部