期刊文献+

整本书阅读考查方式及其对教学的反拨作用探析 被引量:5

Analysis of the Examination Method of“Read and Discuss the Whole Book”and Its Backwash Effect on Teaching
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 “整本书阅读与研讨”任务群的教学与考试紧密相关。目前,全国I卷、北京卷、江苏卷、天津卷四份高考语文试卷,对此任务群的考试方式都进行了有益的探索。以天津卷为代表,结合数据分析和调查问卷,分析其考查方式的优势和不足。对“考不考”“考什么”“如何考”以及“如何教”等问题进行思考。研究认为:应采取隔年考查或者不定年份抽查的方式,侧重于方法的考查,借鉴其它考试的优胜之处,采用群文阅读教学方式,以专题性研讨统筹教学,引导学生“读起来”“读进去”“读通透”“说出来”。尝试厘清考查方式与新课标理念之间的契合度,探索更好的命题方式以更好地反拨教学。 Task-group teaching of"Whole Book Reading and Discussion"is closely related to the examination.At present,a useful exploration of task-group examination methods has been made in these four College Entrance Examination Chinese papers including the National Paper I,Beijing Paper,Jiangsu Paper and Tianjin Paper.Taking Tianjin Paper as the representative,combined with data and questionnaire,it analyzes its advantages and disadvantages of the examination methods.Some problems are taken into account whether to test,what to test,how to teach and how to teach.The research indicates that educators should adopt the method of alternate examination or random check in uncertain years,focus on the methods of examination,draw lessons from the advantages of other examinations,use group-reading teaching methods and coordinate with special discussion to guide students to"read","read thoroughly"and"speak out"in order to clarify the degree of agreement between the examination methods and the new curriculum concept and explore a better propositional way to backwash teaching.
作者 徐娟敏 XU Juanmin
出处 《天津师范大学学报(基础教育版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2021年第3期53-58,共6页 Journal of Tianjin Normal University(Elementary Education Edition)
基金 天津市教委科研计划认定项目“基于核心素养的普通高考及高中学业水平等级性考试试卷设计及评价研究”(2020SK140)阶段性研究成果。
关键词 高中语文 整本书阅读与研讨 高考 考查方式 反拨作用 high school chinese read and discuss the whole book College Entrance Examination examination method backwash effect
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献12

共引文献130

同被引文献57

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部