摘要
距离通常涉及时间和空间两个方面。在历史学科内,历史距离通常指涉过去与现在、事实与叙事之间的关系。文艺复兴伊始,历史距离伴随着对时间的发现而产生。它塑造了不同于中世纪的现代历史意识,并成为支配现代史学研究的重要因素。然而,这种以时间维度为基础的距离观念,忽视了历史距离内涵和价值的丰富性、复杂性。加拿大历史学家马克·菲利普斯在重新思考历史距离的基础上,把距离当作历史表现中一种介质的参与形式,提出了包含形式、情感、意识形态和认知的"距离效应"在内的多种维度来处理过去与现在的关系。这不仅丰富了历史距离的内涵,同时也拓宽了历史认知的路径。笔者在此基础上,尝试以微观史为例来对此进行具体分析。
Distance usually involves both time and space.In the discipline of history,historical distance usually refers to the relationship between the past and the present or between fact and narrative.At the beginning of the Renaissance,historical distance emerged with the discovery of time,which shaped the modern historical consciousness different from that of the Middle Ages and became an important factor that dominated modern historiographical research.However,the concept of distance based on the time dimension ignores the complexity of the connotation and value of historical distance.On the basis of rethinking historical distance,Canadian historian Phillips took distance as a kind of medium in historical representation,and proposed the"distance effects"that include form,emotion,ideology and cognition to deal with the relationship between the past and the present.It not only enriches the connotation of historical distance,but also widens the paths of historical cognition.On this basis,the author tries to take the micro-history as an example to carry on the specific analysis.
出处
《史学月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第11期118-127,共10页
Journal of Historical Science
基金
首都师范大学历史学院2019年科研创新项目“历史时间与历史距离”(2019LS12)。
关键词
历史距离
距离效应
介质
微观史
马克·菲利普斯
Historical Distance
Distance Effects
Medium
Micro-history
Mark Phillips
