摘要
当前,历史研究的对象越来越细微,以微观史为代表的史学取向被称为史学的碎化,并引起了一些人的忧虑。本文认为,微观史研究本身并非必然引起史学的碎片化,在宏大的历史架构下的微观研究应当被理解为历史学的深化和发展。但是,受后现代主义影响、以解构宏大叙事为目的的微观研究,则有可能使史学变得支离破碎。微观史学与宏大叙事不应是对立的关系,历史学需要宏大叙事,而关键的问题在于我们是否应当有更加适合的大历史。
Due to the development of micro-history researches in China, some historians have worried about so-called the fragmentation and dispersion of historiography. The author argues that micro-history study does not necessarily lead to the fragmentation and dispersion. Against the background of a grand history, micro-history study will make contributions to the development of historiography, and extend our historical knowledge. However, micro-history studies under the influence of post-modernism will probably instigate the fragmentation. According to the article, it is unreasonable to separate completely micro-history from major task at present for historians is how to integrate the history instead of making them to be in opposition to each grand narrative in historiography. The former into a proper grand framework of other.
关键词
微观史
史学碎化
宏大叙事
Micro-History, Fragmentation, Grand Narrative
