摘要
东亚发展模式的贡献决不仅仅在工业化和城市化上,同时也是作为推进乡村振兴的一种典型模式而存在的。以日本乡村振兴政策为研究的主线,兼与其他东亚国家展开比较,能够发现,日本乡村振兴最为突出的特点在于其明确的社会政策路向。其政策演变存在着两条非常清晰的线索:一条是依托立法,辅以具体政策,不断赋予乡村政策以社会性的过程;另一条是从乡村工业化到以一村一品为主题的1.5次产业和第六次产业的政策及实践。两条线索的发展演进不是各自独立,而是相互关联、交错在一起的。由此,东亚乡村振兴政策经历了一个从产业政策出发,逐渐增强其社会政策发展路向的过程,其政策体系的社会性越来越强,社会政策的味道越来越浓。关于乡村振兴的基本共识在于,乡村振兴不仅仅是产业振兴,而是被提到乡村发展根本性意义的战略高度,为世界现代化进程提供了独特的经验和贡献。
The contribution of the East Asian model from the perspective of development is by no means only manifested in industrialization and urbanization,but also as a typical model for promoting rural vitalization.Taking Japan’s rural vitalization policy as the main line of research and observation,and comparing it with other East Asian countries,we will find that the most prominent feature of rural vitalization in postwar Japan is its distinct social policy direction.There are two very clear clues to its policy evolution:one is the process to continuously endow rural policies with sociality,relying on legislation while supplemented by specific policies;the other clue is the policy practice from rural industrialization to 1.5 industry with the theme of"One Village,One Product"and to the sixth industry.The development and evolution of the two clues are not independent of each other,but are interrelated and intertwined.As a result,East Asian rural vitalization policy has undergone a process,starting from industrial policy and gradually strengthening development direction of its social policy.The sociality of the policy system and social policy elements are getting stronger and stronger.In summary,the basic consensus on rural vitalization is that rural vitalization is not only industrial vitalization,but is raised to a fundamentally significant strategic height,providing unique experience and contributions to the world modernization process.
作者
田毅鹏
TIAN Yi-peng(School of Philosophy and Sociology,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)
出处
《学习与探索》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第2期23-33,174,共12页
Study & Exploration
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“东亚乡村振兴的社会政策比较研究”(18ZDA119)。
关键词
东亚
乡村振兴
社会政策
政策路向
East Asia
Rural Vitalization
Social Policy
Policy Direction
