摘要
能否通过法律强制执行道德,在自由主义与法律道德主义者之间曾产生过激烈的争辩。以德弗林为代表的传统法律道德主义以至善主义核心传统为理论基础,倡导国家对公民不道德行为的立法干预。自由主义者站在国家中立性的立场上,强调个人自治性的重要意义,以此对法律道德主义提出了诸多批评。乔治基于共同善构建了一种多元至善主义理论,这一理论兼顾了个人自治和价值多元,轻巧地避开了传统法律道德主义经常遭受的那些批评。它一方面能最大限度地保护公民的基本权利和自由,另一方面又能为政府的立法干预提供严格的限制。
There has been a heated debate between liberalists and legal moralists about whether morality can be enforced by law.The traditional legal moralism represented by Devlin is based on the core tradition of perfectionism,which advocates the state’s legislative intervention in citizens’immoral behaviors.On the state neutral standpoint,liberals emphasize the importance of individual autonomy,so they put forward many criticisms to the legal moralism.Based on the notion of common good,George constructed a theory of pluralistic perfectionism,which took both individual autonomy and value pluralism into account.It skillfully avoided the criticism that traditional legal moralism often suffered.On the one hand,it can maximize the protection of the citizens’basic rights and freedom,on the other hand,can provide the government’s legislative intervention with strict restrictions.
出处
《政法论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第4期155-163,共9页
Tribune of Political Science and Law
基金
中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队支持计划
中国政法大学钱端升杰出学者支持计划资助。
