期刊文献+

论刑事诉讼中的“争点主导主义” 被引量:18

On the“Issue-dominated Doctrine”in Criminal Proceedings
原文传递
导出
摘要 为实现司法资源配置在刑事诉讼中的持续优化,充分激活控辩双方的处分自由,有效地保障司法裁判的公正,需要保证实质化庭审仅适用于控辩双方诉讼争议的解决。这不仅需要建构认罪认罚案件和不认罪认罚案件的繁简分流机制,还需要在刑事普通程序内部建构"二元模式",即"有诉讼争议—实质化解决"模式和"无诉讼争议—形式化确认"模式。"有诉讼争议—实质化解决"模式,要求审判机关在妥善确定"诉讼争议"的基础上,真正贯彻直接言词原则,逐步克服对案卷笔录材料的依赖,对"诉讼争议"进行实质化审理。与"有诉讼争议—实质化解决"模式不同,"无诉讼争议—形式化确认"模式,则不需要再贯彻直接言词原则,案卷笔录的证据资格也可以不再受到严格限制。 In order to continuously optimize the allocation of judicial resources in criminal proceedings,to fully activate the litigation rights of both the prosecution and the defense,and to guarantee the fairness of judicial judgments,the substantive court hearing should be applied only to the settlement of litigation disputes of both sides.To this end,on the one hand,diversion mechanism shall be constructed for peccavi cases,in which criminal simplified procedure or criminal quick-trial procedure is generally applied,and for non-peccavi cases,in which criminal common procedure is usually applied,and on the other hand,a"binary model"shall also be constructed inside the criminal common procedure,namely,"litigation dispute for substantive settlement"model and"non litigation dispute for formalized confirmation"model."Litigation dispute for substantive settlement"model requires the court to locate the"litigation dispute"properly,to gradually overcome the reliance on file transcripts,and to hear the"litigation dispute"substantively by truly implementing the principle of direct and verbal trial.However,in contrast to the"litigation dispute for substantive settlement"model,for the"non litigation dispute for formalized confirmation"model,it is unnecessary to implement the principle of direct and verbal trial.In the meanwhile,the evidence competency of file transcripts is also no longer under strict restrictions.
作者 李奋飞 Li Fenfei
出处 《政法论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2020年第4期35-47,共13页 Tribune of Political Science and Law
基金 中国人民大学科学研究基金持续支持项目(14XNJ003)的支持。
关键词 “争点主导主义” “有诉讼争议—实质化解决”模式 “无诉讼争议—形式化确认”模式 "Issue-dominated Doctrine" Substantiation of Court Hearing Formalization of Court Hearing "Litigation Dispute for Substantive Settlement"Model "Non Litigation Dispute for Formalized Confi rmation"Model
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献408

共引文献2794

同被引文献407

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部