摘要
庭审实质化是"以审判为中心"的诉讼制度改革的重要内容。当前对于庭审实质化的理论研讨尚有一些盲点,相关的改革举措也存在较大局限。推进庭审实质化并非是刑事庭审制度局部的技术性改良,而是刑事审判方式转型的系统性工程。首先应当从确定案件类型、审理层级、审理内容三个维度上对庭审实质化予以推进。其次,要重塑以抗辩制为内核的庭审事实发现机制,构建庭审内外部的裁判心证约束机制,规范合议决策和法院案管决策的案件裁断审决机制。
The substantiation of court trial is the important content of the trial-centered reform of procedure system. At present, there are some blind spots in the theoretical study of the substantiation of court trial, and the relevant reform measures have great limitations. Advancing the substantiation of court trial is not the partial technical improvement of the criminal trial system, but the systematic project of the transformation of the criminal adjudication mode. First of all, we should promote the substantiation of court trial from three dimensions which are the determination of the case type, the trial level and the content of the trial. Secondly, we should reconstruct the fact-finding mechanism of court trial which takes the defense system as its core, construct the internal and external restraint mechanism on discretional evaluation of evidence and regulate the decision-making mechanism of the cases judged by the collegiate bench and the court.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期190-206,共17页
China Legal Science
