摘要
从整体来看,保护责任已经取得国际社会的基本共识,但就其3个支柱而言,国际社会对此接受程度不同。争议主要集中于保护责任支柱三能否被国际社会尤其是安理会常任理事国接受。对于保护责任的规范化进程,各国的肯定或否定态度源于一些相同的考量因素,因此可能存在一个统一性的分析框架。对此,本文试图给出一个初步的因素+机制的分析框架。各国对保护责任支柱三的态度差异源于各国对主权和不干预原则奉行的立场不同。因此,需要考虑影响各国对待干预态度的因素。这些因素可被分为两个方面,即影响各国被干预的可能性和干预的可能性。影响主权国家被干预的可能性的变量主要是国家实力和国内分裂程度,而影响其对外干预的可能性的变量是海外利益和消极外部性。
Overall,the Responsibility to Protect(R2P) has become a basic consensus of the international society,with different degrees of acceptance for its three pillars.The controversy is primarily concerning whether the Pillar Three can be accepted by the international society,especially by the permanent members of the UN Security Council.As to the normative process of R2P,the positive or negative attitudes of each country stem from some similar considerations,so a unified analytical framework might exist.In view of this,this paper attempts to give a preliminary analytical framework of factor+mechanism.The differences in countries' attitudes towards the Pillar Three are rooted in their varied positions on sovereignty and the principle of non-interference.Therefore,there is a need to consider factors that affect countries' attitudes towards intervention.These factors can be divided into the two areas:the possibility of countries to be intervened and the possibility of countries to intervene.The variables that affect the likelihood of being intervened are mainly national power and the extent of domestic fragmentation,while the factors that affect the likelihood of intervening are overseas interests and negative externalities.
出处
《国际关系研究》
2017年第5期65-82,共18页
Journal of International Relations
关键词
保护责任支柱三
主权
国家实力
国内分裂程度
海外利益
消极外部性
R2P's Pillar Three
sovereignty
national power
extent of domestic fragmentation
overseas interests
negative externalities
