摘要
中外BITs是否适用于港澳投资者将直接关系到港澳投资者权益的保护。在相关司法实践中,以香港"谢业深案"及澳门"世能案"为例,司法机构的管辖权判决在我国学界引起巨大争议,其实质在于港澳投资者适用中外BITs仍存在不确定性,面临诸多理论困境。从国内的角度来说,我国关于国际条约的适用问题缺乏统一指导标准,中外BITs也没有明确之条文将这一问题解释清楚。从国际层面来看,国际投资仲裁庭倾向于优先适用国际法而忽视国内法也是导致争议的原因之一。在香港和澳门特区政府均申明积极参与"一带一路"经济协同发展的情况下,我国相关BITs需要在文本中明确意愿和立场以协调其在港澳投资方面的适用。
W hether BITs between China and foreign countries are applicable to the investors from Hong Kong an d
Macao，will be directly related to protection of investors’rights and interests．In the relevant judicial practice，with
the example of “Tza Yap Shum Case” and “Sanum Case” ，judgment from a judiciary with jurisdiction has aroused great controversy in China’s academic circles．Its essence lies in whether BITs between China and foreign
countries apply to the investors from Hong Kong and M acao or not，which is facing man y theoretical difficulties．
From the perspective of domestic law，first of all，it lacks uniform guidance standards in application of international
treaties．M oreover．BITs do not have a clear provision to explain this issue in China．At the internationallevel，it
is also one of the reasons for the international investment arbitration tribunal to take the priority of international
law and to ignore domestic law．The governments have declared to participate in the “the Belt and Road
Initiatives” actively in Hong Kong and M acao，therefore，it is significant to clarify the points and positions in
China’s BITs to coordinate the application．
出处
《国际商务研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期67-76,共10页
International Business Research
关键词
“一带一路”
特别行政区
双边投资条约
条约适用
“the Belt and Road Initiatives”
special administrative regions
bilateral investment treaties； the
application of treaties
