期刊文献+

培养计算思维,发展STEM教育——2016美国《K-12计算机科学框架》解读及启示 被引量:26

Cultivating Computational Thinking and Developing STEM Education——An Analysis of 2016 American《K-12 Computer Science Framework 》
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 计算思维是信息时代每个人都应具备的基本素养,是计算机科学的核心思想。STEM教育则是计算思维培养与计算机科学教育的重要途径之一。该文通过对2016美国《K-12计算机科学框架》的解读及其核心概念、核心实践、实施过程的梳理,挖掘计算思维培养在中小学计算机科学教育中的重要性,以及STEM教育在节约时间与师资、减轻学生学习负荷、强化知识技能等方面的作用,并在此基础上提出了该框架对我国中小学信息技术教育的几点启示,以期能够缓解目前计算机科学应用普及化与教育边缘化间的矛盾,使学生能够获取最优化的学习途径,真正成为未来的创造者。 Computational thinking is the basic quality that every person should have in the information age. It is the core idea of computer science. Then, STEM is one of the important ways for computational thinking cultivating and computer science educating. This paper explores the importance of computing thinking in the primary and secondary education through the analysis of K-12 Computer Science Framework as well as its core concepts, core practices and implementation process. Simultaneously, it is found that STEM education need less time and fewer teachers, could reduce students' learning load and strengthen the grasp of knowledge and skills. On this basis, this paper puts forward several enlightenment for the computer science education in our country so as to alleviate the contradiction between the popularization of computer science application and the marginalization of computer science education, so that the students can get effective approaches to learning and truly become the creator in the future.
出处 《中国电化教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期47-53,共7页 China Educational Technology
基金 全国教育科学"十二五"规划教育部重点课题"可视化技术支持下学科知识自主学习模型研究"(项目编号:DCA130224)资助
关键词 计算思维 计算机科学 STEM Computational Thinking Computer Science STEM
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献70

  • 1Bothwell T H. Iron requirements in pregnancy and strategies to meet them. Am J Clin Nutr, 2000, 72: S257-S264.
  • 2邵瑞珍.教育心理学[M].上海:上海教育出版社,1997..
  • 3秦炜炜.全球化时代美国教育的STEM战略[J].教育技术资讯,2007(10).
  • 4Asghar, A. , Ellington,R. , Rice, E. , et al. (2012). Support- ing Stem Education in secondary science contexts [ J ]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6(2) : 4.
  • 5Bruning, R. H. , Schraw, J. G. , Norby, M. M. & Ronning, R. R. ( 2004 ) Cognitive psychology and instruction [ M ]. Columbus, OH : Pearson.
  • 6Byhee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 version[ J:. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70( 1 ) :30-35.
  • 7Frykholm J, Glasson G. (2005). Connecting science and mathe- matics instruction: pedagogical context knowledge for teachers [ J ]. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3): 127-141.
  • 8Herschbach D. R. (2011 ). The stem initiative: constraints and challenges. [J]. Journal of Stem Teacher Education, 48( 1 ) : 96-122.
  • 9Hurd, P. D. (1975) Science,Technology, and Society: New Coals for Interdisciplinary Science Teaching [ J ]. Science Teacher, 42 (2) : 27-30.
  • 10Johnson L. , Adams becker S. , Cummins M. , et al. (2013). Technology outlook for community, technical, and junior colleges 2013- 2018: An N MC Horizon Project sector analysis [ J ]. Austin, Texas: the New Media Consortium.

共引文献1475

同被引文献136

引证文献26

二级引证文献154

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部