期刊文献+

技术性贸易壁垒对我国水产品出口的二元边际影响——基于对日美韩出口数据的分析 被引量:5

The impact of TBT on dual margin of China's aquatic exports:an analysis based on the exports to Japan,USA and Korea
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用2002-2014年我国水产品出口六位编码数据,对我国水产品出口的二元边际进行了测度,并在此基础上定量评估了技术性贸易壁垒对二元边际可能的影响,得出了以下几点主要结论:第一,近年来,我国水产品出口的总量增长主要是扩展边际的贡献,但集约边际也发挥了重要的作用;第二,技术性贸易壁垒对出口二元边际的影响均为负,但对集约边际的影响更为显著,第三,经济发展规模、水产品生产效率、经济自由指数和国际宏观经济冲击对水产品出口的集约边际和扩张边际均有着不同程度的影响,但影响力度和影响方向不完全相同。因此,面对各国纷繁复杂的技术性贸易壁垒,我国政府、出口企业和行业协会必须要加强合作,共同改变我国水产品出口的不利局面。 This paper uses the six-encoded export data of aquatic products from 2002 to 2014,and measures the binary marginal of China's aquatic products exports. On this basis,the paper makes a quantitative assessment of the TBT impact and obtains the following conclusions: Firstly,in recent years,the total growth of China's export of aquatic products was mainly due to extensive margin,but intensive margin also play an important role in aquatic products export; secondly,TBT have a significant inhibitory effect on China's total export of aquatic products at the perspective of intensive margin. Thirdly,economic development、Aquatic production efficiency、Index of economic freedom and international shock also have different degrees of impact on the export of aquatic products. Faced with the complicated technical barriers to trade of differe nt of countries,our government,export enterprises and industry associations must strengthen cooperation and take all positive measures to change the unfavorable situation of aquatic products exports.
作者 杨卫 吴萌 YANG Wei WU Meng(College of Economics Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)
出处 《中国渔业经济》 2017年第1期67-73,共7页 Chinese Fisheries Economics
关键词 水产品 贸易壁垒 二元边际 aquatic products TBT binary margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献44

  • 1岳芹,王洪涛.技术标准——国际贸易的制高点[J].农业装备与车辆工程,2007,45(2):60-62. 被引量:3
  • 2董坚峰.中国应对技术壁垒的对策研究[J].技术与创新管理,2007,28(1):1-3. 被引量:2
  • 3Calvin L, Krissoff B. Technical barriers to trade: a case study of phytosanitary barriers and US-Japanese apple trade [J ]. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1998,23 (2) :351 - 356.
  • 4Bureau J C, Marette S, Schiavina A. Non-tariff trade barriers and consumers' information: the case of the EU-US trade dispute over beef [ J ]. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 1998,25 (4) : 437 - 462.
  • 5Yue C Y, Beghin J, Jensen H H. Tariff equivalent of technical barriers to trade with imperfect substitution and trade costs [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2006,88 (4) :947 - 960.
  • 6Lupien J R. The precautionary principle and other non-tariff barriers to free and fair international food trade[J]. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2002,42 (4) : 403 - 415.
  • 7Calvin L, Krissoff B, Foster W. Measuring the costs and trade effects of phytosanitary protocols: a US-Japanese apple example[J]. Review of Agriculture Economics, 2008, 30 (1):120- 135.
  • 8Hooker N H, Caswell J A. A framework for evaluating nontariff barriers to trade related to sanitary and phytosanitary regulation[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999,50 (2) : 234 - 246.
  • 9Xie B, Li T Y, Zhao K Q, et al. Impact of EU organiccertification regulation on organic exports from China [ J ]. Outlook on Agriculture, 2005,34(3) : 141 - 147.
  • 10孙睦优.国际贸易中技术壁垒及发展趋势[J].中南论坛(综合版),2007,2(3):65-67. 被引量:1

共引文献14

同被引文献32

引证文献5

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部