摘要
本研究通过深度访谈,调查探析了14名国家社会科学基金项目通讯评审专家的评审策略与态度。研究发现,受访专家在社科基金项目评审的总体标准指导下,主要采用两类评审策略:一类是"一点淘汰法",即只要不符合关键标准,课题就被否定;另一类是"比较法",即在同等条件下根据自己制定的优先顺序标准优中选优。在评审态度方面,所有受访专家均视评审为"神圣"任务。他们态度认真,尽力做到客观、公平;碰到不熟悉课题时,他们会查阅资料,防止误判。最后,受访专家还为项目申请者提出了中肯的建议。
This interview study investigated the strategies and attitudes of blind reviewers in evaluating applications for the National Social Science Fund of China. Using a convenient sampling method, the study selected 14 experi- enced reviewers as participants. Through a content-based analytic approach, it identified two general strategies employed by the reviewers under the guidance of the national evaluation criteria. The first is labelled as the＂ one- criterion elimination strategy＂, which was adopted to screen out unsuccessful applications according to the critical cri- terion set up by individual reviewers; the second is the ＂comparison strategy＂, which was used to select the best ap- plications out of the ones with similar qualities based on the priority criteria perceived by the reviewers. In terms of attitudes, all the reviewers were found to treat the evaluation as a sacred mission, strive for fairness and objectivity, and make efforts to prevent misjudgement in the face of unfamiliar topics. The study finally summarized some useful recommendations for writing fund applications suggested by the reviewers.
出处
《外语界》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期22-29,共8页
Foreign Language World
关键词
国家社科基金
通讯评审
评审策略
评审态度
the National Social Science Fund of China
blind review
evaluation strategies
evaluation attitudes
