摘要
关联性是电子证据在法庭上运用的关键性指标。作为一种虚拟空间的证据,电子证据用于定案必须同时满足内容和载体上的关联性。前者是指其数据信息要同案件事实有关,后者突出表现为虚拟空间的身份、行为、介质、时间与地址要同物理空间的当事人或其他诉讼参与人关联起来。这些关联性的良好实现,有赖于我国电子证据规则、刑事民事取证制度以及司法鉴定技术规范的创新。大数据的出现和发展,为电子证据的关联性理论带来了新的挑战。
Relevance is the key criteria for the use of electronic evidence in the court. As evidence that exists only in digital space, electronic evidence should follow the double-relevance principle, i. e. the principle of relevant both in content and in form. The content relevance principle demands that the content of the data is relevant to the case facts; the form relevance principle means that the virtual identity, behavior, medium, time-stamp and site of electronic data should be consistent with those of the parties or other participants to the lawsuit in physical world. Especially, the second principle is essential to the determination of the relevance of electronic evidence. The full realization of these rele- vance principles relies on the innovation in the rules of electronic evidences, the institutions of obtai- ning evidences in criminal and civil litigations, and the technological norms of judicial appraisement. Recently, massive emergence of big data, whose relevance is different from that of electronic evi- dence, also brings new challenges to the relevance of electronic evidence. It is theoretically possible to admit big data evidence in the court through limited application of the admissibility rule.
出处
《法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期175-190,共16页
Chinese Journal of Law
基金
2015年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“网络安全的刑事法治应对”(项目批准号15 JJD820011)的阶段性成果
关键词
电子证据
大数据
关联性
证据规则
electronic evidence, big data, relevance, rules of evidence
