期刊文献+

存在竞争性制造商的集团采购供应链需求预测信息的共享与激励 被引量:23

Incentives for Demand Forecast Sharing in Group-purchasing Supply Chains with Competing Manufacturers
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对两个竞争性制造商通过集团采购组织(GPO)采购部件时,是否向GPO共享需求预测信息的激励问题,考虑各制造商拥有有限信息、共享部分信息、基于产量竞争的情形,通过建立博弈模型,分析了竞争强度、信息精度和市场波动对信息共享价值的影响,进而提出了信息共享激励策略。研究表明:信息共享能够协调制造商间的竞争,当且仅当竞争强度超过某阈值时,信息共享能够增加供应链的系统预期利润,此时,用两部制补偿协议可激励制造商完全共享信息;当竞争强度和市场波动均较大时,通过信息共享激励,分散式决策能够实现比集中式决策更大的系统预期利润。最后,通过算例对研究结论进行了直观考察和说明。 With much change of the market and the diversification of demand,variety and small batch production mode has increasingly become a main way of manufacturing.In this context,driven by the pressure to control operating costs and focus on core competencies,group purchasing has been drawing heightened attention from practitioners and researchers in the last decade.Although,in the big data age,information sharing is an important part and essential support of group purchasing,a major challenge is the reluctance of some firms to share information because of the fear of loss.To address this incentive problem,agroup purchasing supply chain consisting of one group purchasing organization(GPO)and two competing manufacturers is studied.The manufacturers purchase a common component from the GPO and compete in quantity by selling partially substitutable products in a common market.Each manufacturer is endowed with some private and imperfect information about the uncertain demand intercept and is allowed to share partial information with the GPO.A three-stage game model is used to study the participants' equilibrium decisions.In the first stage,each manufacturer decides a level of information to share with the GPO before observing the demand,and subsequently,shares the observed demand information with the GPO according to the specified level.In the second stage,the GPO sets a unified wholesale price of the component for the manufacturers.In the third stage,upon learning the wholesale price,each manufacturer decides his order quantity.Our research mainly contains the following four parts.Firstly,by solving the model,the impacts of competition intensity and information accuracy on the equilibrium decisions are analyzed.Secondly,we explore the value of information sharing and reveal the feasible condition of information sharing.Thirdly,a two-part compensation contract is proposed as an incentive strategy for information sharing.Finally,the coordinating effect of information sharing is shown by comparing with the performance under centralized decision setting,companied with numerical examples.The results indicate that both manufacturers have no incentive to share their private information with the GPO in equilibrium.However,information sharing can coordinate the competition between the manufacturers.When the competitive intensity exceeds a certain threshold,the supply chain system can be benefited from information sharing.Only then the manufacturers can be incented to share complete information by a two-part compensation contract.Based on this incentive contract,the supply chain system can realize higher expected profit under decentralized decision setting than that under centralized decision setting when both the competition intensity and demand variation are large enough.In summary,in this paper,group purchasing is studied with an informational perspective and a new insight is provided into the coordinating effect of vertical information sharing on horizontal competition.The findings in this paper can provide academic and practical inspirations on group purchasing.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期41-51,共11页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272086 71572020) 国家863计划资助课题(2012AA040904)
关键词 信息共享 需求预测 集团采购 产量竞争 激励 information sharing demand forecast group purchasing quantity competition incentives
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1国务院国资委.邵宁在中央企业集中采购培训班上的讲话[EB/OL]. (2013 - 05 - 28)[2013 - 06 - 06], http://www. sasac. gov. cn/nll80/nl566/n258252/n258599/15375046. html.
  • 2Kauffman R J, Wang Bin. New buyers,arrival underdynamic pricing market microstructure: The case ofgroup-buying discounts on the Internet [J]. Journal ofManagement Information Systems, 2001,18(2) : 157 -188.
  • 3Anand K S, Aron R. Group buying on the web: A com-parison of price-discovery mechanisms [J]. ManagementScience, 2003,49(11): 1546 -1562.
  • 4Hu Ming, Shi Mengze,Wu Jiahua. Simultaneous vs.sequential group-buying mechanisms [J]. ManagementScience,2013,59(12):2805_2822.
  • 5唐方成,池坤鹏.双边网络环境下的网络团购定价策略研究[J].中国管理科学,2013,21(3):185-192. 被引量:56
  • 6Chen R R,Roma P. Group buying of competing retail-ers [J], Production and Operations Management, 2011,20(2):181-197.
  • 7Hu Qiaohai, Schwarz L B. Controversial role of GPOsin healthcare-product supply chains [J]. Production andOperations Management, 2011,20(1) : 1 -15.
  • 8Hu Qiaohai, Schwarz L B,Uhan N A. The impact ofgroup purchasing organizations on healthcare-productsupply chains [J]. Manufacturing Service OperationsManagement, 2012 T 14(1) :7 -23.
  • 9陈敬贤,马志强,孟庆峰.线性量折扣方案下团购策略对渠道绩效的影响[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(1):110-119. 被引量:15
  • 10Balakrishnan A,Natarajan H P. Integrated procure-ment planning in multi-division firms [J]. Productionand Operations Management, 2014, 23 ( 10): 1795 -1810.

二级参考文献74

共引文献105

同被引文献190

引证文献23

二级引证文献238

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部