2Belker AM,Thomas AJ Jr,Fuchs EF,et al. Resuhsof 1 469 micro- surgical vasectomy reversals by the vasovasostomy study group [ J ]. J Urol,1991,145 :505 -511.
4Li PS, DongQ, Goldstein M. Microsurgical approaches to the treatment of obstructive azoospermia [ J ]. ZhonghuaNanKeXue, 2004, 10(9) : 643 -650.
5Boorjian S, Lipkin M, Goldstein M. The impact of obstructive inter- val and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal [ J ]. Urol,2004,171 ( 1 ) :304 -346.
6Schiff J, Li PS, Goldstein M. Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy in rats [ J ]. Int J Med Robot,2005 1 (2) : 122 - 126.
7Kuang W, Shin PR, Matin S, et al. Initial evaluation of robotic tech- nology for microsurgical vasovasostomy [ J]. Uro1,2004, 171 ( 1 ) : 300 - 303.
9Martin E, Carnett JB, Levirv. The treatment of sterility due to ob- struction at the epididymis. Together with a study of morphology of human spermatozoa [ J ]. U Pennsylvania Med Bull, 1903,15 ( 2 ) : 1903.
10Lespinasse V. Obstructive sterility in the male [ J ]. JAMA, 1918, 70:448.
4Jarow JP. Seminal vesicle aspiration in the management of patients with ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol, 1994, 152(3) : 899 -901.
5Turek PJ, Magana JO, Lipshultz LI. Semen parameters before and after transurethral surgery for ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol, 1996, 155(4): 1291-1293.
6Paick J, Kim SH, Kim SW. Ejaculatory duct obstruction in infertile men. BJU Int, 2000, 85(6) : 720-724.
7Engin G, Kadioglu A, Orhan I, et al. Transreetal US and endorectal MR imaging in partial and complete obstruction of the seminal duct system. A comparative study. Acta Radiol, 2000, 41 ( 3 ) : 288-295.
9Purohit RS, Wu DS, Shinohara K, et al. A prospective comparison of 3 diagnostic methods to evaluate ejaculatory duct obstruction. J Urol, 2004, 171 ( 1 ) : 232-236.
10Poore RE, Schneider A, DeFranzo A J, el al. Comparison of puncture versus vasotomy techniques for vasography in an animal model. J Urol, 1997, 158(2) : 464-466.
