摘要
目的:通过对比两种睡眠呼吸暂停综合征治疗方法的临床效果,探索疗效更显著、更具价值的治疗方法。方法:选取2013年1月-2015年1月期间我院诊断治疗的阻塞型睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者175例作为研究对象,随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组患者采取耳穴磁珠贴压法进行治疗;对照组患者采取耳穴胶布贴压法进行治疗。观察两组患者的临床效果、呼吸紊乱指数(AHI)、全部入眠时间(TST)、睡眠效率(SE)以及总觉醒时间。结果:实验组100例患者经过治疗后67例有效,总有效率为67.0%;对照组75例患者中15例有效,总有效率为20.0%,两组临床疗效比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者治疗前AHI、TST、SE以及总觉醒时间相比无明显差异(P>0.05);两组患者治疗后AHI、TST以及总觉醒时间相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗前后两组患者AHI、TST以及SE相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),实验组总觉醒时间治疗前后有明显差异,对照组无明显差异。结论:临床内科耳穴磁珠贴压法治疗阻塞型睡眠呼吸暂停综合征疗效显著,具有一定的临床意义。
Objective To compare the efficacy of different methods on OSAS, and find a better method. Methods： 175 cases wererandomly divided into the experimental group and control group. The experimental group took the auricular plaster therapy with magneticbead; the control group took the auricular plaster therapy with adhesive plaster. Methods： In the experimental group, 67 cases wereeffective; the total efficiency was 67.0%. In the control group, 15 cases were effective; the total efficiency was 20.0% （P〈0.05）. Beforetreatment, differences of AHI, TST, SE and total arousal between groups were not significant （P〉0.05）. After treatment, differences ofAHI, TST and total arousal between groups were statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Before and after treatment, differences of AHI, TST andSE between two groups were statistically significant （P〈0.05）. In the experimental group, the difference of total arousal before and aftertreatment was obvious. Conclusion： The auricular plaster therapy with magnetic bead was effective on OSAS and contained some clinicalsignificance.
出处
《中医临床研究》
2016年第7期62-63,共2页
Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
