摘要
从各国刑事诉讼制度变迁的基本事实出发,大致可以概括出三种不同的刑事诉讼制度发展模式,即立法修律模式、司法判例模式与试点实验模式.这三种模式具有不同的内在特质,在推动刑事诉讼制度发展上各有其独特优势与内在局限.各国刑事诉讼制度变迁的历程表明,刑事诉讼制度发展不能只依赖一种模式,应是多种模式的组合或交替使用.目前我国刑事诉讼制度发展主要依靠立法修律和试点实验,司法判例还未被有效运用.未来应该根据各国刑事诉讼制度发展的经验以及上述三种模式的实际价值与内在局限,合理确定我国刑事诉讼制度发展的模式组合。
From the basic facts of institutional change of criminal procedure system in various countries, three different modes of criminal procedure systems development can be roughly summarized, namely legislation and amendment mode, judicial precedents mode and pilot testing mode. The three modes with different intrinsic qualities have their own unique advantages and inherent limitations in promoting the development of criminal procedure system. The process of criminal procedure systems change in various countries indicates that the development of criminal procedure system can not rely on only one mode, but it is a combination or alternating use of multiple modes. At present the development of China＇ s criminal procedure systems mainly rely on legislative amendments to the law and pilot testing, the judicial precedents has not been effectively used. We should reasonably set the combination of criminal procedure systems development modes according to the experience in the development of the criminal justice system of various countries and the actual value and functional limitations of hereinbefore three modes.
出处
《南京大学法律评论》
CSSCI
2014年第2期236-252,共17页
Nanjing University Law Review
基金
四川省社科规划年度项目《从经验到法律:刑事诉讼地方性试点改革研究》(SC13E050)的阶段性成果
四川大学中央高校基本科研业务费研究专项学科前沿与交叉创新研究重点项目
四川大学“985工程”社会矛盾与社会管理研究创新基地的资助
关键词
刑事诉讼制度发展
立法修律模式
司法判例模式
试点试验模式
Institutional Development of Criminal Procedure
Legislation and Amendment Mode
Judicial Precedents Mode
Pilot Testing Mode
