摘要
列维纳斯和布伯关于生态伦理的分歧是人类中心主义和非人类中心主义争论的又一形态。为了化解主客模式对自然的客体化和工具化,布伯主张超越主客关系的非人类中心主义。但是列维纳斯批判布伯的非人类中心主义具有形式主义的特征。列维纳斯对布伯的质疑,主要以非对等的非对称关系为前提。通过对此质疑的分析,可以初步得出结论,以平等的非对称关系为前提能够建立一种以人的责任为中心来回应人与自然共在关系的生态伦理。
Levinas and Buber＇ s debate on ecological ethic is another form of the argument between anthropocentrism and non - anthropoeentrism. Refusing the objectification and instrumentation of nature in the Subject - Object pattern, Buber contended the non - anthmpoeentrism which transcended the Subject - Object relationship. But Levinas criticized the formalism of Buber＇ s non - anthropocentrism. The unequally asymmetry relationship premised the critique. A new ecological ethic could be proposed through the analysis of the critique. It is the duty of human being to respond the coexistence of human being and nature on condition of the equally asymmetry relationship.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第11期72-78,共7页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金
北京化工大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目"生命伦理原则的责任基础(QN0919)"
关键词
生态伦理
关系
形式主义
责任
主体
Ecological ethic
relationship
formalism
responsibility
subject
