摘要
"光源隐喻"象征着哲学家们对永恒存在、绝对同一的追求与迷恋。最初柏拉图以"洞穴喻"对此做了经典的描述。自此以后,"光源隐喻"便以各种不同的形式出现在传统西方哲学当中。然而,列维纳斯指出,传统西方哲学的这种"光源化"具有相当的负面性,表现为理性自我的孤独以及对他者的忽视,由此构成"唯我论"的暴力。列维纳斯认为人们应该逃离这种"光源"哲视之宰制,为此,就必须走出存在之光,逃离本体论思维,并趋向一种绝对的他者,走向一种伦理形而上学。
＂Illumination-Metaphor＂ implies that philosophers aspire after the eternal Being and absolute Same. ＂Gave-Metaphor＂ described by Plato is the classical delineation. From then on, ＂Illumination-Metaphor＂ unfolded in the tradition of Western philosophy by some sort of modification. However, Levinas suggests that ＂Light＂ in western thought results in the solitude of reason itself and neglect of the Other. It is the violence of egology. Consequently, we do not absolve from the gaze of luminosity unless we slipped away from the light of Being and the thought of ontology, and then approach the absolute other and ethical metaphysics.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第2期1-5,共5页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词
光
暴力
他者
伦理
light
violence
other
ethics
