期刊文献+

澳门人的风险知觉与赌博行为 被引量:20

RISK PERCEPTION AND GAMBLING BEHAVIOR AMONG Macao RESIDENTS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用匿名问卷法,调查澳门人的风险知觉与赌博行为。结果显示: (1)赌场的劝世文既无劝勉也无劝阻人们赌博的作用; (2)社会关系网的钱财支援不影响实际赌博次数; (3)多次性博弈与一次性博弈所采用的是不同的机制,一次性博弈不是由期望值所决定的; (4)相互监视和制裁系统会影响赌博:受法律制裁约束的职业者比不受法律制裁约束的职业者更不好赌;自估在赌场遇见认识人的机会与赌博次数呈负相关; (5)性别及母语等“本质趋向”差异表明,所谓澳门人不好赌有其渊源并可能是在长期的文化沉淀中形成的; (6)受教育程度是影响赌博的有效预测变量。这些发现的理论含义一并进行了讨论。 Triggered by rather surprising reports that Macao residents are less keen on gambling, anonymous questionnaire was designed to explore risk perception and gambling behavior among Macao residents. Results revealed that (1) the warning sign provided by the local Casino would neither dissuade nor persuade one to gamble; (2) the knowledge of 'financial help from social network' did not permit prediction of gambling preference; (3) the multiple-play and single-play gambles were in fact so utterly different that the short-run one was perhaps not based on the expected value rule; (4) the predictions of the sanction systems proposed by institutional view of culture were consistent with the observed findings that the government employees gamble less than non-government employees and that the more likely a resident was recognized in a Casio the less likely he or she was going to gamble; (5) some 'intrinsic tendency' related variables were gender and mother tongue, which implied that the observed difference in gambling was rooted in long-standing cultural value; (6) the education level was a good predictor of gambling. The theoretical implications for these findings in risk-taking were discussed.
作者 孙悦 李纾
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2005年第2期260-267,共8页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
关键词 赌博行为 劝世文 社会关系网 多次性博弈 人口统计变量 Gambling behavior, warning sign, social network, multiple-play gambles, demographic variable.
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1曾坤.触摸澳门经济[N].人民日报海外版,2002—12—30.
  • 2陈立宇.不好赌的澳门人[N].人民日报海外版,2003—03—24.
  • 3Machina M. Choice under uncertainty: Problems solved and unsolved. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1987, 1: 121-154.
  • 4Bernoulli D. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Comentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperiales Petropolitanae, 1738, 5:175 -192. (Trans. by L. Sommer in Eeonometriea, 1954, 22:23-36. ).
  • 5Allais M. Le comportement de lhomme rationnel devant le risque:Critique des postulats et axiomes de 1' ecole Americaine.Eeonometriea, 1953, 21:503-546.
  • 6Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47 : 263 -291.
  • 7Ceombs C H, Bowen J N. A test of VE-theories of risk and the effect of the central limit theorem. Acta Psychologica, 1971,35 : 15-28.
  • 8Wedell D H, Bockenholt U. Moderation of preference reversals in the long run. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1990, 16(2): 429-438.
  • 9Li S. The role of expected value illustrated in decision-making under risk : single-play vs multiple-play. Journal of Risk Research, 2003,6(2) : 113 -124.
  • 10Li S. Extended research on dominance violations in similarity judgments: The equate-to-differentiate interpretation. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 2001, 11 : 13 -38.

二级参考文献17

  • 1[1]Allais M. Le comportement de 1' homme mtionnel devant le risque:Critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole Americaine.Econometrica, 1953, 21:503-546
  • 2[2]Savage L. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley,1954
  • 3[3]Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47:263-291
  • 4[4]Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory:Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5:297-323
  • 5[5]Allais M. An outline of my main contributions to economic science (Nobel Lecture). Theory and Decision, 1991, 30:1-26
  • 6[6]Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 1981, 211:453-458
  • 7[7]Li S. Can the conditions governing the framing effect be determined? Journal of Economic Psychology, 1998, 19:135-155
  • 8[8]Li S. What is wrong with Allais' certainty effect? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1993, 6:271-281
  • 9[9]Li S, Adams A S. Is there something more important behind framing? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995, 62:216-219
  • 10[10]Bernoulli D. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis.Comentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperiales Petropolitanae,1738, 5:175-192. (Trans. by L. Sommer in Econometrica,1954, 22:23-36)

共引文献17

同被引文献472

引证文献20

二级引证文献155

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部