期刊文献+

基于新浪微博热点事件的群体极化特征研究 被引量:3

原文传递
导出
摘要 基于对新浪微博上"秦火火"和"薛蛮子"两个热点事件从出现至消失期间主要数据的分析,发现参与讨论的网民态度均在事件发生后的一周中产生了不断极端化的现象,并且群体态度由积极转向消极,在这一过程中"意见领袖"和"法规约束"对网民态度影响较大。
作者 黄瑾 王天梅
出处 《电子政务》 CSSCI 2014年第6期38-45,共8页 E-Government
基金 北京哲学社会规划重点项目"首都社会稳定视角下的互联网治理对策研究"(编号:12JGA014) 中央财经大学科研创新团队支持计划
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Moscovici S,Zavalloni M.The Group as a Polarizer of Attitudes[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969.12(2):125-135.
  • 2Myers D G,Bishop G D.Discussion Effects on Racia Attitudes[J].Science,1970,169(3947):778-779.
  • 3尼葛洛庞帝.数字化生存[M].海口:海南出版社,1996.140.
  • 4Wallace P.互联网心理学[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2001:191-206.
  • 5莫斯科维奇,S.群氓的时代[M].许列民,等,译.南京:江苏人民出版社.2003.
  • 6桑斯坦K H.网络共和国-网络社会中的民主问题[M].黄维明.译上海:上海人民出版社.2003.
  • 7迈尔斯D.社会心理学[M].张智勇,乐国安,侯玉波,等,译.北京:人民邮电出版社,2006.
  • 8Conover M D,Ratkiewicz J,Francisco M.et al.Politica Polarization on Twitter[C]//Fifth International AAA Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.California,USA AAAI Press 2011.
  • 9Guerra P H C,Wagner M Jr Cardie C,et al.A Measure of Polarization on Social Media Networks Based on Community Boundaries[C]//7th International AAA Conference on Weblogs and Social Media(ICWSM).Boston AAAI Press.2013.
  • 10Yardi S,Boyd D.Dynamic Debates:An Analysis of Group Polarization over Time on Twitter[J].Bulletin of Science.Technology & Society,2010,30(5):316-327.

二级参考文献59

共引文献294

同被引文献19

  • 1吴明隆.结构方程模型:Amos的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:212-262.
  • 2桑斯坦K H.网络共和国-网络社会中的民主问题[M].黄维明.译上海:上海人民出版社.2003.
  • 3中国社会科学院新闻与传播研究所.中国新媒体发展报告(2014)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2014.
  • 4Stoner J A F. A Comparison of Individual and Group Decisions Dissertation University of nvolving Risk[M]. Cambridge: Doctora Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, 1961.
  • 5Fishbein M Applications A Theory of Reasoned Action: Some and Implications[J]. Nebraska Symposium on Motivatio, 1980(27): 65-116.
  • 6Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991 50(2): 179-211.
  • 7Perugini M, Bagozzi R P. The Role of Desires and Anticipated Emotions in Goal-Directed Behaviours: Broadening and Deepening the Theory of Planned Behavior[J]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2001, 40(1): 79- 98.
  • 8Yardi S, Boyd D. Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization over Time on Twitter[J]. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 2010, 30(5): 316-327.
  • 9Drennan J, Fry M L, Previte J. Using the Model of Goal- Directed Behaviour to Understand Responsible Drinking[C]. Proceedings of the 2013 Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference 2013.
  • 10Perugini M, Bagozzi R P, The Distinction between Desires and Intentions[J]. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2004, 34(1): 69-84. [14]Bagozzi R P Dholakia U M. Antecedents and Purchase Consequences of Customer Participation in Small Group Brand Communities[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2006, 23(1): 45-61.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部