期刊文献+

江苏省淮安市常住居民健康素养影响因素分析 被引量:12

Affacting factors of health literacy among Huaian residents
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 了解江苏省淮安市常住居民健康素养水平分布状况,并探索其影响因素,为制定健康教育干预策略和措施提供依据.方法 采用分层多阶段整群随机抽样的方法,于2012年9至12月对淮安市15~ 69岁3 480名常住居民进行问卷调查,调查内容分为基本知识和理念、健康生活方式和行为、基本技能等三个维度;按健康问题分为科学健康观、传染病预防、慢性病预防、安全与急救、基本医疗和其他等6类.对健康素养水平影响因素进行x2检验和Logistic回归分析.结果 3 480名调查对象具备健康素养水平的人数为424名,健康素养水平为12.2%.单因素分析显示,城乡、性别、不同年龄组、不同文化程度、不同职业人群、家庭年收入高低,健康素养水平差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).多因素Logistic回归分析显示,相对于农村,城市对健康素养影响的OR (95% CI)值为1.558(1.234~ 1.966);相对于不识字或识字很少,小学、初中、高中/职高/中专、大专/本科及以上对健康素养影响的OR(95%CI)值分别为4.651 (2.327~9.295)、9.833 (5.121~ 18.880)、15.451 (7.798~ 30.615)和22.937(10.766~ 48.870);相对于公务员,医务人员对健康素养影响的OR(95%CI)值为3.789(1.292~11.114);相对于家庭年收入<30 000元,≥30 000元对健康素养影响的OR(95%CI)值为1.478(1.149~1.901),是健康素养的促进(危险)因素.结论 淮安市15~ 69岁常住居民健康素养水平为12.2%,健康素养水平较低,应加强健康素养干预和监测研究,制定有效的对策和措施,促进健康素养水平的全面提高. Objective To evaluate health literacy and its affacting factors in of Huaian residents so as to provide evidence for comprehensive health education. Methods A total of 3 480 subjects aged 15-69 years old were recruited from Huaian city in the second half of 2012 by using stratified multi-stage cluster random sampling. Three dimensions were covered in this investigation: basic knowledge and concept, healthy lifestyle and behavior, and basic skills. Six health problems were involved: scientific healthy concept, prevention of infectious disease, prevention of chronic disease, safety and first aid, basic medical and others. Chi-square test and logistic regression were used for data analysis. Results The health literacy ratio was 12.2% (424/3480). In single factor analysis, urban and rural, gender, age, education, job, income were affecting factors of health literacy (P〈0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that the odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) of urban vs rural areas was 1.558 (1.234-1.966), OR (95%C/) of primary school vs illiteracy was 4.651 (2.327-9.295), OR (95%C/) of junior high school vs illiteracy was 9.833 (5.121- 18.880), OR (95%C/) of senior high school vs illiteracy was 15.451 (7.798-30.615), and OR (95%C/) of undergraduate vs illiteracy was 22.937 (10.766-48.870). In addition, OR (95%C/) was 3.789 (1.292-11.114) when medical personnel was compared with civil servants, and OR (95%C/) was 1.478 (1.149-1.901) when adults whose household income over ¥ 30 000 was compard with those below ¥ 30 000. Conclusion The rate of health literacy among Huaian residents was 12.2%. Health literacy intervention and monitoring should be strengthened and the preventive control measures should be established to improve residents' health literacy.
出处 《中华健康管理学杂志》 CAS 2014年第2期120-123,共4页 Chinese Journal of Health Management
关键词 健康素养 问卷调查 LOGISTIC模型 Health literacy Questionnaires Logistic models
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献64

  • 1卢建华,吴建国,吴静娜,王福影,徐文君,李星.构建适合中国国情的健康管理体系[J].中国全科医学,2009,12(3):212-215. 被引量:83
  • 2陈洪海,陈忠,黄丞.建立社区老年公寓护理模式探讨[J].护理学杂志,2006,21(7):75-76. 被引量:12
  • 3American Medical Association and Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs (1999).Health literacy:report of the council on scientific affairs[J].Journal of the American Medical Association,1999,281:552-557.
  • 4World Health Organization.The Bangkok charter for health promotion in a globalized world[J].Health Promot J Austr,2005,16(3):168-171.
  • 5US Department of Health and Human Services.Healthy people 2010[M].Washington,DC:GPO,2000.56.
  • 6肖瓅.中国公众健康素养调查及评价体系建立[D].北京:中国疾病预防控制中心健康教育所,2008.
  • 7中华医学会健康管理学分会 中华健康管理学杂志编委会.健康管理概念与学科体系的中国专家初步共识[J].中华健康管理学杂志,2009,3:141-147.
  • 8卫生部妇幼保健与社区卫生司,中国健康教育中心/卫生部新闻宣传中心.首次中国居民健康素养调查报告[R].北京:卫生部,2009.
  • 9Edington DW.Zero trends:health as a serious economic strategy.Ann Arbor,Michigan:Health Management Research Center,University of Michigan,2009.
  • 10王龙文 赵元蒲 杨青松.我国健康科普瓶颈[J].中华健康管理学杂志,2009,3.

共引文献550

同被引文献123

引证文献12

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部