期刊文献+

论新制度主义三大流派的分歧与融合 被引量:14

An Analysis of the Divergent and Fusion of the Three Schools' of New Institutionalism
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 新制度主义是在对行为主义理论方法加以批判的基础上重新将制度引入政治学研究的。新制度主义中的诸流派在制度内涵、研究层面、研究角度和对本体论的认识等方面均存在差异。其中历史制度主义、理性选择制度主义和社会学制度主义三个主要流派从不同研究维度入手,揭示人类行为及其与制度间的互动关系,在对政治现象的解释上各有特色。这三个流派在发展中既有所不同,又显现出融合的趋势,使新制度主义学派的研究思路进一步拓宽,从而推动了政治研究的发展。 New institutionalism re-introduced institutional research into political research on the basis of criticizing the theory and methods of behaviorism. Various schools of new institutionalism are different in institutional connotation, research level, research perspectives and ontological understandings. Among these schools, historical institutionalism, ra tional choice institutionalism and sociological institutionalism reveal the interactive relationship between human behavior and institutions from different research perspectives, and display their features respectively. Even though the three schools are different in some aspects, they show the trend of integration as well, which broads the research train of thoughts of new institutionalism and pushes the progress of political study forward.
作者 谭融 郝丽芳
出处 《理论与现代化》 CSSCI 2013年第6期5-10,共6页 Theory and Modernization
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"发展中国家民主化道路比较研究"成果之一 项目编号:13BZZ014 国家社科重大攻关项目"中国特色人权发展道路研究"成果之一 项目编号:11&ZD072
关键词 新制度主义 历史制度主义 理性选择制度主义 社会学制度主义 New institutionalism Historical institutionalism Rational choice institutionalism Sociological institutionalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1朱德米.新制度主义政治学的兴起[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2001,43(3):107-113. 被引量:61
  • 2朱德米.当代西方政治科学最新进展——行为主义、理性选择理论和新制度主义[J].江西社会科学,2004,24(4):192-199. 被引量:17
  • 3Clark,William Roberts.Agents and Structures:Two Views of Preferences,Two Views of Institutions[J] .International Studies Quarterly.42,1998.245-270.
  • 4Peters,Guy B.Institutional Theory in Political Science:The New Institutionalism[M] .2nd.Gosport,Hampshire:Ashford Colour Press Ltd,2005.(19-22).
  • 5Reich,Simon.The Four Faces of Institutionalism:Public Policy and a Pluralistic Perspective,in Governance[J] .An International Journal of Policy and Administration.Vol.13,No.4.October,2000.501-522.
  • 6Rhodes,R.A.W.etc.The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions[M] .Oxford:Oxford University Press.2008.xvi.
  • 7Pierson,Paul.The Path to European Integration:A Historical Institutionalism Analysis[J] .Comparative Political Studies.Vol.29,No.2.April.1996.126.
  • 8马雪松,周云逸.社会学制度主义的发生路径、内在逻辑及意义评析[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2011(3):61-65. 被引量:29
  • 9Steinmo,S.,etc.Structuring politics:Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis[M] .Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1992.2.
  • 10Hay,Colin & Daniel Wincott.Structure,Agency and Historical Institutionalism[J] .Political Studies.46,1998.951-957.

二级参考文献91

  • 1熊彼特.经济发展理论[M].北京:北京商务印书馆,1990..
  • 2[1]丁冰等.现代西方经济学说[M].北京:北京经济出版社,1999.
  • 3[3]戴维斯·诺斯.制度变革和美国经济增长[M].英国:桥桥大学出版社,1971.
  • 4B. G. Peters, Institutional Theory in Political Science: The "New Institutionalism", London and New York: Pinter, 1999, p. 98.
  • 5James G. March and Johan P. Olsen, "The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life", American Political Science Re- view, 1984, Vol. 78 (3), pp.744-7.
  • 6Andrew Abbott, "An Old Institutionalist Reads the New Institutionalism", Contemporary Sociology, 1992, Vol. 21, p. 754.
  • 7Mary C. Brinton and Victor Nee (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1998, pp. 10 -12.
  • 8R. A. W. Rhodes, Sarah A. Binder and Bert A. Rockman ( eds. ), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford : Oxford Univer- sity Press, 2006, p. 61.
  • 9Peter A. Hall and Rosemary C. R. Taylor, "Political Science and Three New Institutionalisms", Political Studies, 1996, Vol. ⅩLⅣ, p. 947.
  • 10B. G. Peters, Institutional Theory in Political Science: The "New Institutionalism", London and New York: Pinter, 1999, p. 97.

共引文献121

引证文献14

二级引证文献147

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部