期刊文献+

导航与普通透视对手术室医务人员放射量的对比分析 被引量:13

Contrast analysis of the radiation between navigation and fluoroscopy in the operating room
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的 探讨计算机辅助导航技术对手术室医护人员所受辐射量的影响.方法 自从2004年我院手术室引进导航设备以来,导航技术广泛应用于神经外科,创伤骨科,脊柱外科等专业.自2005年7月~2011年7月间我们手术室一共应用导航技术治疗患者近600例.我们与骨科医师合作,从中选取部分病例进行分析.根据术中透视方式的不同,分为普通透视组(A组)和计算机导航组(B组),分别记录透视时间,螺钉置入时间,透视量,螺钉置入准确率等结果进行分析.所有手术均由同一级别医师主刀完成.结果 我们通过研究发现:透视时间及透视量普通透视组明显高于导航组,螺钉置入时间普通透视组明显长于导航组,螺钉置入准确率,导航组为100%,明显高于普通透视组的91.2%.结论 计算机辅助导航技术辅助骨科手术治疗,可以明显降低透视时间和透视量,缩短螺钉置入时间,减少手术室医护人员的放射线暴露及工作量,提高螺钉的置入准确率,是未来骨科手术技术的一种趋势. Objective To study the influence of the radiation dose to the operating room staff in the computer-assisted operation surgery. Methods Since the introduction of navigation equipment in 2004, navigation technology is widely used in neurosurgery and orthopedic trauma, spine and so on. From July 2005 to July 2011, we have operated nearly 600 patients with navigation technology. We cooperated with orthopedic surgeon, and chose and analysised some cases. According to the different methods of intraoperative fluoroscopy, we divided these patients into ordinary perspective group (group A) and computer navigation group (group B), and recorded the perspective time, screw-placed time, perspective dose and accuracy of screw placement. All surgeries were performed by one surgery. Results We found that the perspective time and the amount, in the group A was significantly higher than those in the group B. Screw-placed time in the group A was significantly longer than the group B. The accuracy of screw placement in navigation group was 100%, while that in the perspective group was 91.2%0. Conclusion Computer-assisted navigation technology can significantly reduce the perspective time, shorten the time of screw placement, decrease the radiation exposure of the nurses in operating room of and improve accuracy of screw placement. So it is a trend of the technology of orthopaedic surgery in the future.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2013年第10期1631-1634,共4页 Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词 放射计量 骨折 导航 Radiation dose Fracture Computer-assisted operation surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Roberts DW, Strohbehu JW, Hatch JF, el al. A frameless stereolagic integration of computerized tomographic imaging and the operating microscope [J]. J Neurnsurg, 1986, 65 545-549.
  • 2Steinmann JC, Herkow itz HN, EI-Ko mmong H, et al. Spi nal pedicle fixation: confirmation of an image based technique for screw placement [J]. Spine, 1993, 18: 1856-1861.
  • 3Gebhard FT, Kraus MD, Schneider E, et al. Does computer- assisted spine surgery reduce intraoperative radiation doses? [J]. Spine(PhilaPa1976), 2006, 31: 2024-2027.
  • 4Zwingmann J, Konrad G, Kotter E, et al. Computer-naviga- ted iliosacral screw insertion reduces malposition rate and ra diation exposure [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467: 1833-1838.
  • 5Smith HE, Welsch MD, Sasso RC, et al. Comparison of ra- diation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluo roscopy vs computer-assisted image guidance with intraopera- tive three-dimensional imaging [J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2008, 31:532 537.
  • 6Nakashima H, Sato K, Ando T, et al. Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision o{ isoeentrie :arm 3- dimensional fluoroscopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fluoroscopy method with minimally invasive surgery [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2009, 22: 468: 47.
  • 7许世宏,杨永良,周东生,何吉亮,穆卫东,王甫.三维导航与普通透视下置入寰椎侧块和枢椎椎弓根螺钉治疗寰枢椎不稳的比较[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2012,14(12):1059-1064. 被引量:9
  • 8Kosmopoulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accura cy: a meta analysis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007, 32: 111-120.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Brooks AL, Jenkins EB. Atlanto-axial arthrodesis by the wedge com- pression method. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1978, 60: 279-284.
  • 2Holness RO, Huestis WS, Howes WJ, et al. Posterior stabilization with an intelaminar clamp in cervical injuries: technical note and re- view of the long term experience with the method. Neumsurgery, 1984, 14: 318-322.
  • 3Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine, 2001, 26: 2467-2471.
  • 4Jun BY. Anatomic study for ideal and safe posterior C1-C2 transar- ticular screw fixation. Spine, 1998, 23: 1703-1707.
  • 5Gebhard FI', Kraus MD, Schneider E, et al. Does computer-assisted spine surgery reduce intraoperative radiation doses? Spine, 2006, 31: 2024-2027; discussion 2028.
  • 6Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, et al. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine, 2007, 32: E56-E64.
  • 7Anderson LD, D' Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. 1974. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86: 2081.
  • 8Xie Y, Li Z, Tang H, et al. Posterior C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw internal fixation for atlantoaxial instability. J Clin Neurosci, 2009, 16: 1592-1594.
  • 9Claybrooks R, Kayanja M, Milks R, et al. Atlantoaxial fusion: a biomechanical analysis of two C1-C2 fusion techniques. Spine J, 2007, 7: 682-688.
  • 10Goel A, Laheri V. Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxa- tion. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 1994, 129:47-53.

共引文献8

同被引文献136

引证文献13

二级引证文献102

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部