期刊文献+

三维导航与普通透视下置入寰椎侧块和枢椎椎弓根螺钉治疗寰枢椎不稳的比较 被引量:9

Isocentric C-arm 3D navigation versus conventional C-arm fluoroscopy for placement of CI lateralmass and C2 pedicle screws in treatment of atlantoaxial instability
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较等中心C型臂(Iso-C)三维导航与普通透视下辅助下置人寰椎侧块和枢椎椎弓根(C1LM-C2P)螺钉的准确性。方法对2006年6月至2011年6月采用C1LM-C2P螺钉内固定治疗的30例寰枢椎小稳患者资料进行回顾性研究,男16例,女14例;年龄39~52岁,平均45.6岁、,根据术中辅助影像技术的不同分为Iso-C三维导航组(导航组,14例)和普通透视组(透视组,16例)。两组患者术前一般资料比较差肆均无统计学意义(P〉0.05),具有可比性。记录并比较两组患者的于术时间、透视时间、术中失血量、置钉准确率和日本骨科协会评分(JOA)。结果导航组和透视组置人C1LM-C2P螺钉的平均手术时间分别为(132.1±6.4)min和(143.2±8.2)min,差异尤统计学意义(仁1.761.P=0.093)。导航组术中平均透视时间(46.84±1.4)s较透视组(65.24±2.9)s明显减少,导航组平均术中失血量(305.64±50.8)mL较透视组(472.4±56.1)mL明显减少,导航组和透视组分别有94.6%和82.8%的螺钉评为0级,以上指标两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。所有患者术后平均随访12.4个月,术后6个月颈椎X线片示骨折愈合。术后6个月导航组和透视组平均JOA评分分别为(15.2±0.2)分和(15.3±0.3)分,差异无统计学意义(P=0.756);但较术前[(9.1±1.1)分]明显改善,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论采用ClLM-C2P螺钉治疗寰枢椎不稳时,术中采用Iso-C三维导航比普通透视能显著提高螺钉置人的准确性,并能显著减少术中透视时间及术中出血量。 Objective To compare the isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional (lso-C 3D) navigation versus conventional C-arm fluoroscopy in terms of accuracy of placing CI lateral mass and C2 pedicle (C1LM-C2P) screws in the treatment of atlantoaxial instability. Methods Thirty patients with atlantoaxial instability were treated with fixation with CI I,M-C2P screws in our hospital from June 2006 to June 201 I. They were 16 men and 14 women, aged frnm 39 to 52 years (average, 45.6 years). The Iso-C 3D navigation group had 14 patients and there were 16 patients in the conventional fluoroscopy group. The 2 groups were comparable in general clinical data ( P 〉 0.05) . The operation time, radiation time, intraoperative blood loss, insertion accuracy and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were recorded and compared between the 2 groups. Results There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the mean operation time (132. 1 ±6.4 minutes versus 143.2 ±8.2 minutes) ( t = 1. 761, P =0. 093) . The mean radiation time for the lso-C 3D navigation group (46.8 ± 1.4 seconds) was significantly shorter than for the conventional fluo- roscopy group (65.2±2.9 seeomts), the mean blood loss for the navigation group (305.6 ±50.8 mL) was significantly less than for the fluoroscopy group (472.4± 56. 1 mL), the percentage of screws of grade 0 forthe navigation group (94. 6% ) was significantly higher than for the fluoroscopy group (82.8%) ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . The mean follow-up of 12.4 months revealed fracture union on cervical X-ray films 6 months post- operation. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the mean JOA score 6 months post- operation (15.2± 0. 2 points versus 15.3 ± 0. 3 points), but there were significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative scores in the 2 groups ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion In the treatment of at- lantoaxial instability with fixation with C1LM-C2P screws, compared with conventional C-ann fluoroscopy, Iso-C 3D navigation can significantly improve the accuracy of screw placement and reduce intraoperative flu- oroscopic time and blood loss.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期1059-1064,共6页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
基金 山东省医药卫生科技发展计划(2009年第HZ062号)
关键词 寰椎 枢椎 外科手术 计算机辅助 骨钉 Atlas Axis Surgery, computer-assisted Bone nail
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Brooks AL, Jenkins EB. Atlanto-axial arthrodesis by the wedge com- pression method. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1978, 60: 279-284.
  • 2Holness RO, Huestis WS, Howes WJ, et al. Posterior stabilization with an intelaminar clamp in cervical injuries: technical note and re- view of the long term experience with the method. Neumsurgery, 1984, 14: 318-322.
  • 3Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine, 2001, 26: 2467-2471.
  • 4Jun BY. Anatomic study for ideal and safe posterior C1-C2 transar- ticular screw fixation. Spine, 1998, 23: 1703-1707.
  • 5Gebhard FI', Kraus MD, Schneider E, et al. Does computer-assisted spine surgery reduce intraoperative radiation doses? Spine, 2006, 31: 2024-2027; discussion 2028.
  • 6Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, et al. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine, 2007, 32: E56-E64.
  • 7Anderson LD, D' Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. 1974. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86: 2081.
  • 8Xie Y, Li Z, Tang H, et al. Posterior C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw internal fixation for atlantoaxial instability. J Clin Neurosci, 2009, 16: 1592-1594.
  • 9Claybrooks R, Kayanja M, Milks R, et al. Atlantoaxial fusion: a biomechanical analysis of two C1-C2 fusion techniques. Spine J, 2007, 7: 682-688.
  • 10Goel A, Laheri V. Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxa- tion. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 1994, 129:47-53.

二级参考文献21

  • 1梁国穗,邓宁,张戈,吕红斌.骨盆-髋臼骨折X线透视导航下闭合复位与经皮固定[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(7):637-639. 被引量:24
  • 2Matta JM,Merritt PO.Displaced acetabular fractures.Clin Orthop Relat Res,1988(230):83-97.
  • 3Kaempfe FA,Bone LB,Border JR.Open reduction and internal fixation of acetabular fracture:heterotopic ossification and other complication of treatment.J Orthop Trauma,1991,5:439-445.
  • 4Mosheiff R,Khoury A,Weil Y,et al.First generation computerized fluoroscopic navigation in percutaneous pelvic surgery. J Orthop Trauma,2004,18:106-111.
  • 5Matta JM. Fracture of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1996,78:1632-1645.
  • 6Majeed SA.Grading the outcome of pelvic fracture.J Bone Joint Surg Br,1989,71:304-306.
  • 7Tonetti J,Carrat L,Lavalleé S,et al.Percutaneous iliosacral screw placement using image guided techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1998(354):103-110.
  • 8Gay SB,Sistrom C,Wang GJ,et al.Percutaneous screw fixation of acetabular fractures with CT guidance:preliminary results of a new technique.AJR Am J Roentgenol,1992,158:819-822.
  • 9Starr AJ, Reinert CM, Jones AL. Percutaneous fixation of the columns of the acetabulum: a new technique. J Orthop Trauma,1998,12:51-58.
  • 10Kahler DM,DeGrange D,Wang GJ.Percutaneous fixation of selected acetabular fractures using computed tomographic guidance.Presented at AAOS Annual Meeting,Atlanta,1996.

共引文献13

同被引文献78

引证文献9

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部