期刊文献+

高速铁道车辆蛇行脱轨安全性评判方法研究 被引量:25

Hunting Derailment Safety Evaluation Method of High Speed Railway Vehicle
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过建立轮轨三维几何接触模型、整车动力学分析模型和轮轨碰撞模型,分析高速铁道车辆蛇行失稳后的蛇行脱轨过程及其影响因素。高速铁道车辆的蛇行脱轨过程是一个爬轨和跳轨并存的复杂过程,轮对的名义冲角和有效冲角分别对准静态的爬轨和动态的跳轨起着重要影响作用;随着轮对横移速度的增大、轮轨摩擦系数以及车轮垂向载荷的减小,车轮的跳轨高度越大;横向蠕滑力在整个蠕滑力中所占比例以及轮对横向运动能量越大,车辆越容易脱轨。因此高速铁道车辆的蛇行脱轨安全性应根据轮对横移速度限值并考虑车辆的横向运行稳定性进行评判。当高速铁道车辆分别表现为"超临界"和"亚临界"的蛇行失稳极限环分岔形式时,可分别采用转向架横向加速度移动均方根值方法和转向架横向加速度限值对其横向运行稳定性进行评判。 A three-dimensional wheel-rail geometry contact model, a vehicle dynamic analysis model and a wheel-rail impact model are established and combined to investigate the dynamic derailment process of high speed railway vehicle and its influencing factors after the vehicle loses the running stability. In the process of hunting derailment, flange climb derailment and jumping derailment coexist, the nominal angle of attack plays an important role in the process of quasi-static flange climb derailment, whereas the effective angle of attack greatly affects the dynamic jumping derailment. With the increase of wheelset lateral velocity, the decrease of wheel rail friction coefficient and wheel vertical load, the wheel jump height will increase. The greater the proportion of lateral creep force in the whole creep force and wheelset lateral movement energy, the more likely vehicle derailment. Thus for the evaluation of the hunting derailment safety of high speed railway vehicle, both the wheelset lateral velocity limit values and vehicle lateral running stability should be taken into account. When high speed railway vehicle system shows a supercritical Hopf bifurcation, the moveable RMS value of bogie lateral acceleration is proposed to evaluate the lateral running stability. However, when it shows a subcritical Hopf bifurcation, the bogie lateral acceleration limit value is recom- mended for the evaluation of the lateral running stability.
出处 《中国铁道科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期82-92,共11页 China Railway Science
基金 铁道部科技研究开发计划项目(1219YF1305,1334YF2705)
关键词 高速车辆 蛇行脱轨 评判指标 轮轨接触 High speed railway vehicle Hunting derailment Evaluation index Wheel-rail contact
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1KOO J S,CHOI S Y.Theoretical Development of a Simplified Wheelset Model to Evaluate Collision-Induced Derailments of Rolling Stock[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration,2012,331 (13):3172-3198.
  • 2GILCHIST A O,BRICKLE B V.A Re-Examination of the Proneness to Derailment of a Running Wheelset[J].Journal Mechanical Engineering Science,1976,18 (3):131-141.
  • 3BRAGHIN F,BRUNI S,DIANA G.Experimental and Numerical Investigation on the Derailment of a Railway Wheelset with Solid Axle[J].Vehicle System Dynamics,2006,44 (4):305-325.
  • 4ELKINS J A,CARTER A.Testing and Analysis Techniques for Safety Assessment of Rail Vehicles:the State of the Art[J].Vehicle System Dynamics,1993,22 (3/4):185-208.
  • 5ELKINS J,WU H.Angle of Attack and Distance-Based Criteria for Flange Climb Derailment[J].Vehicle System Dynamics,1999,33 (Supplement):291-305.
  • 6TAKAI H,UCHIDA M,MURAMATSU H,et al.Derailment Safety Evaluation by Analytic Equations[J].Quarterly Report of RTRI,2002,43 (3):119-124.
  • 7SWEET L M,KARMEL A.Evaluation of Time-Duration Dependent Wheel Load Criteria for Wheelclimb Derailment[R].[S.1.]:ASME,1980.
  • 8KIK W,MENSSEN R,MOELLE D,et al.Comparison of Results of Calculations and Measurements of DYSAFTests,A Research Project to Investigate Safety Limits of Derailment at High Speeds[J].Vehicle System Dynamics,2002,37 (Supplement):543-553.
  • 9WEINSTOCK H.Wheel Climb Derailment Criteria for Evaluation of Rail Vehicle Safety[C]//Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting.New Orleans Hilton,New Orleans,Louisiana,USA:ASME,1984:1-7.
  • 10SANTAMARIA J,VADILLO E G,GóMEZ J.Influence of Creep Forces on the Risk of Derailment of Railway Vehicles[J].Vehicle System Dynamics,2009,47 (6):721-752.

二级参考文献34

  • 1罗世辉,金鼎昌,陈清.轮对纵向振动与机车车辆相关问题研究[J].铁道学报,2005,27(3):26-34. 被引量:19
  • 2夏禾,陈英俊,张煅,柯在田.列车提速情况下铁路双线简支钢桁梁动力响应分析[J].铁道学报,1996,18(5):75-82. 被引量:11
  • 3铁道部科学研究院 济南铁路局.徐州分局南津浦线货物列车脱轨试验报告[M].,1997..
  • 4石田弘明 手冢和彦 等.脱轨稳定性评定指标的研究[J].铁道综研报告,1995,9(8):49-54.
  • 5宫本昌幸.车辆的脱轨机理[J].铁道综研报告,1996,10(3):31-38.
  • 6铁道部科学研究院 北京铁路局.大秦线C63A货物列车脱轨试验报告[M].北京:铁道部科学研究院,1997..
  • 7铁道部科学研究院 郑州铁路局.郑武线最高速度240km/h高速列车综合运行试验研究报告[M].北京:铁道部科学研究院,1998..
  • 8翟婉明.货物列车动力学性能试验评判规范的研究及建议方案[M].成都:西南交通大学列车与线路研究所,2000..
  • 9铁道部科学研究院.我国干线轨道不平顺功率谱的研究[M].北京:铁道部科学研究院,1999..
  • 10(日)涌井一 松本信之 等.列车与轨道相互作用解析法的研究.土木学会论文集[M].,1995.513.

共引文献112

同被引文献383

引证文献25

二级引证文献176

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部