期刊文献+

替吉奥单药治疗老年晚期胃癌的临床疗效分析 被引量:5

Clinical Study on the Effect of Monotherapy of Tegafer Gimeracil Oteracil Porassium Capsules on Elderly Advanced Gastric Cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的观察单药口服替吉奥治疗老年晚期胃癌的近期临床效果和不良反应的发生情况。方法将62例老年晚期胃癌患者随机分成替吉奥组36例和对照组26例。替吉奥组采用替吉奥胶囊(S-1)单药口服治疗,对照组采用FOLFOX4方案化疗,治疗3个周期后评估和比较两组的临床疗效及不良反应。结果两组治疗有效率(25.0% vs. 26.9%)及1年生存率(47.20% vs. 53.8%)比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);但替吉奥组生活质量的改善率明显高于对照组(33.3% vs. 11.5%,P<0.05);对照组不良反应的发生率明显高于替吉奥组(P<0.05),周围神经毒性仅见于对照组。结论口服替吉奥治疗老年晚期胃癌的近期疗效与FOLFOX4方案相当,但较其更安全。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of Tegafer Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium (S-1) in the treat- ment of elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods 62 cases of elderly advanced gastric cancer were randomly divided into two groups: the S-1 group (n=36) and the control group (n=26). The S-1 group was only treated with S-1 twice daily, and the control group was treated by FOLFOX4. The effect and toxicities in the two groups were analyzed after three cycles of chemotherapy. Results No significant difference was observed in response rate (25.0% vs. 26.9%) and one-year survival rate (47.20% vs. 53.8 %) between the two groups. But the improvement rate of quality of hfe was significantly higher in S-1 group than in the control group, and the adverse reaction rate was lower in S-1 group than in control group. Peripheral neurotoxicity was only observed in the control group. Conclusion The S-1 had an equivalent clinical efficacy to FOLFOX4 regimen in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer, but it was safer than FOLFOX4 regimen.
出处 《肿瘤药学》 CAS 2013年第5期378-381,共4页 Anti-Tumor Pharmacy
关键词 老年晚期胃癌 替吉奥 化疗 FOLFOX4方案 Elderly Advanced Gastric Cancer S-1 Chemotherapy FOLFOX4 regimen
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Shanbhogue AKP,Karnad AB,Prasad SR. Tumor re-sponse evaluation in oncology:current update[J].J Com-put Assist Tomogr,2010,(04):479-484.
  • 2孙燕;周际昌.临床肿瘤内科手册[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,199833-34.
  • 3Liem BJ,Holland JM,Kang MY. Kamofsky per-formance status assessment resident versus attending[J].{H}Journal of Cancer Education,2002,(03):138-141.
  • 4Jemal A,Bray F,Center MM. Global cancer statistic[J].{H}CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians,2011,(02):69-90.
  • 5沈琳,鲁智豪.胃癌药物治疗新视角[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(2):103-108. 被引量:15
  • 6邓清明,李登进.西妥昔单抗联合改良的FOLFIRI方案二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究[J].肿瘤药学,2011,1(4):366-369. 被引量:9
  • 7Cunningham D,Starling N,Rao S. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer[J].{H}New England Journal of Medicine,2008,(01):36-46.
  • 8Moon YW,Rha SY,Jeung HC. Outcomes of mul-tiple salvage chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer:implications for clinical practice and trial design[J].Can-cer Chemother Pharmacol,2010,(04):797-805.
  • 9彭若飞.卡培他滨单药节拍化治疗老年晚期胃癌21例疗效观察[J].肿瘤药学,2011,1(6):514-517. 被引量:18
  • 10Tougeron D,Hamidou H,Scotté M. Esophageal cancer in the elderly:an analysis of the factors associated with treatment decisions and outcomes[J].{H}BMC Cancer,2010.510.

二级参考文献54

共引文献94

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部