期刊文献+

Ki-67在乳腺浸润性导管癌不同分子亚型中的表达及意义 被引量:13

Ki-67 expression and significance of different molecular subtypes of breast invasive ductal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析Ki-67在不同分子亚型的乳腺浸润性导管癌中的表达,初步探讨其意义。方法采用免疫组织化学法测定126例乳腺浸润性导管癌标本的雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER-2)、Ki-67的表达以明确其分子亚型,同时分析Ki-67的表达与各分子亚型及临床病理特征的关系。结果Ki-67的表达在患者年龄的分布、肿物的大小中差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05),而在组织学分级、淋巴结转移中的差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05),其表达与ER、PR表达呈负相关(r=-0.273,P=0.002;r=-0.242,P=0.007),与HER-2表达呈正相关(r=0.245,P=0.006)。Ki-67在LumianlA中均呈低表达(17/17),在其他分型中均呈高表达,其中,〉50%的高表达率在各型所占比例随分型程度递增,且不同分子亚型间Ki-67的表达差异有统计学意义(,=62.392,P〈0.05)。结论Ki-67表达高低与乳腺浸润性导管癌组织学分级、淋巴结转移及分子分型有关,其高表达往往提示预后不良,因此有必要与ER、PR、HER-2联合作为临床病理的常规检测项目。 Objective To analyze Ki-67 expression and explore its significance in different molecular subtypes of breast invasive ductal carcinoma ( IDC ) . Methods The expressions of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) and Ki- 67 were detected in 126 cases of IDC by immunohistochemical staining. Then the molecular subtype of each case of 1DC was determined. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the relationship between Ki-67 expression and the molecular subtypes with clinicopathological features of IDC. Results There was no statistically significant difference of Ki-67 expression in age and tumor size ( P 〉 0. 05 ). However, significant difference existed in histological grading and lymph node metastasis ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The expression level of Ki- 67 was negatively correlated with ER expression(r = -0. 273, P =0. 002) and PR expression(r = -0. 242, P = 0. 007 ) and positively with HER-2 expression ( r -- 0. 245, P = 0. 006 ). A low expression of Ki-67 was in LumianlA subtype ( 17/17 ) and high expression in other molecular subtypes. Moreover, the rate of high expression ( Ki-67 LI 〉 50% ) in each subtype progressively increased with the degree of molecular typing and Ki-67 expression in different molecular subtypes showed significant difference ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions The expression level of Ki-67 is correlated with histological grading and molecular type of IDC. High expression of Ki-67 carries poor prognosis. Thus it is necessary to perform a variety of routine clinicopathological examinations, such as Ki-67, ER, PR and HER-2.
作者 周素娟 郭华
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第36期2895-2897,共3页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 分子分型 KI-67 Breast neoplasms Molecular typing Ki-67
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Cheang MC, Chia SK, Voduc D, et al. Ki67 index, HER-2 status, and prognosis of patients with Luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2009,101:736-750.
  • 2《乳腺癌HER-2检测指南(2009年版)》编写组.乳腺癌HER-2检测指南(2009年版).中华病理学杂志,2009,38:836-840.
  • 3Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, et al. Strategies for subtypes- dealing with the diversity of breast caneer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oneol,2011,22 : 1736-1747.
  • 4Gerdes J, Schwab U, LemKe H, et al. Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuelear antigen associated with cell proliferation. Int .1 Cancer. 1983.31 13-20.
  • 5黄玉钿,张声.乳腺浸润性导管癌组织FAK、Ki67的表达及其临床意义[J].中国免疫学杂志,2007,23(6):559-562. 被引量:2
  • 6杨欢,陈晓耕,陈新,陈志忠.乳腺浸润性导管癌组织Ki-67表达及其分子分型的意义[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2012,19(3):212-216. 被引量:45
  • 7刘鑫,刘启峰,徐晔,欧阳涛,李金锋,王天峰,范照青,范铁,林本耀,解云涛.中国年轻乳腺癌的临床病理特征及预后分析[J].中华医学杂志,2011,91(26):1817-1820. 被引量:14
  • 8Hussein MR, Abd-Elwahed SR, Abdulwahed AR. Alterations of estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors and c-erbB2 oncogene protein expression in ductal carcinomas of the breast. Cell BiolInt, 2008,32:698-707.

二级参考文献40

  • 1Sundquist M, Thorstenson S, Brudin L, et al. Incidence and prognosis in early onset breast cancer. Breast, 2002, 11 : 30-35.
  • 2Chia KS, Du WB, Sankaranarayanan R, et al. Do younger female breast cancer patients have a poorer prognosis'? Results from a population-based survival analysis. Int J Cancer, 2004, 108 : 761 - 765.
  • 3Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [ DB/OL]. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2011 [ 2011-03-23 ]. http://globocan, iarc. fr/factsheets/ populations/factsheet, asp? uno = 900.
  • 4Hcst H, Lund E. Age as a prognostic factor in breast cancer. Cancer, 1986, 57: 2217-2221.
  • 5Adami HO, Malker B, Holmberg L, et al. The relation between survival and age at diagnosis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 1986, 315: 559-563.
  • 6Fisher ER, Anderson S, Redmond C, et al. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project protocol B-O6. lO-year pathologie and clinical prognostic discnminants. Cancer, 1993, 71 : 2507-2514.
  • 7Soerjomataram I, Louwman MW, Ribot JG, et al. An overview of prognostic factors for long-term survivors of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2008, 107: 309-330.
  • 8Mohle-Boetani J, Grosser S, Malec M, et al. Survival advantage among patients with breast cancer diagnosed at 45 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med, 1986, 315: 587.
  • 9Anderson BO, Senie RT, Vetto JT, et al. Improved survival in young women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol, 1995,2 : 407- 415.
  • 10Garicochea B, Morelle A, Andrighetti AE, et al. Age as a prognostic factor in early breast cancer. Rev Saude Publica, 2009, 43: 311-317.

共引文献58

同被引文献114

  • 1Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013 [ J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2013, 63(1) : 11 -30.
  • 2Bian L, Wang T, Zhang SH,et al. Ki-67 Index as a prognostic factor of subsequent lapatinib-based therapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with resistance to trastuzumab [ J ]. Cancer Biol Ther,2014, 15(4) : 365 -370.
  • 3Mirtavoos-Mahyari H, Khosravi A, Esfahani-Monfared Z. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and estrogen receptor status in respect to tumor characteristics in non-metastatic breast cancer [J]. Tanaffos, 2014, 13(1): 26-34.
  • 4Gerdes J, Schwab U, Lemke H, et al. Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen asso- ciated with cell proliferation [ J ]. Int J Cancer, 1983, 1 ( 1 ) : 13 -20.
  • 5Santisteban M, Reynolds C, Ban" Fritcher EG, et al. Ki67 : a time-varying biomarker of risk of breast cancer in atypical hyper- plasia[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2010, 121 (2): 431 - 437.
  • 6Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Ravdin PM, et al. Ki67 In breast cancer : prognostic and predictive potential [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2010, 11(2): 174-183.
  • 7Li FY, Wu SG, Zhou J, et al. Prognostic value of ki-67 in breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph nodes: a retrospective cohort study[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(2) : e87264.
  • 8Hwang SH, Park do J, Jee YS, et al. Risk factors for operative complications in elderly patients during laparoscopy-assisted gas- trectomy[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2009 ,208(2) :186 - 192.
  • 9Konsti J, Lundin M, Joensuu H, et aL Development and evalua- tion of a virtual microscopy application for automated assessment of Ki-67 expression in breast cancer [ J]. BMC Clin Pathol, 2011, 11: 13.
  • 10Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, et al. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER- 2/neu oncogene [ J ]. Science, 1987, 235 (4785) : 177 - 182.

引证文献13

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部