期刊文献+

论刑事案外第三人财产权之程序保障 被引量:5

On the Procedural Safeguards of the Third Party’s Property in Criminal Procedure
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在刑事诉讼中,有必要加强案外第三人的财产权保障,但我国的刑事诉讼立法在此方面却具有严重的缺失性。我国应当借鉴域外一些立法,从赋予案外第三人程序参与权与知情权、建立公正的涉案财物裁决程序与合理的举证责任分担制度等方面,加强对案外第三人财产权的程序保障。 It is necessary to enhance the safeguards of the third party’s property in criminal procedure,while there is a serious absence about these safeguards in China.We should use the experience of other countries for reference and enhance the safeguards of the third party’s property in criminal procedure through endowing the third party with the right of participating in the criminal procedure and of being informed and establishing impartial verdict procedure of property involved in cases and reasonable systems about the burden of proof.
作者 吴光升
出处 《贵州警官职业学院学报》 2013年第1期42-47,共6页 Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
基金 国家社科基金一般项目"刑事涉案财物处理程序研究"(12BFX060) 最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题"刑事诉讼中的违法所得没收程序研究"(GJ2012C16)
关键词 刑事诉讼 案外第三人 财产权程序保障 criminal procedure the third party procedural safeguards of property right
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1松尾浩也.日本刑事诉讼法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005:241.
  • 2田口守一.刑事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2000..
  • 3Simon N. M. Young. Civil Forfeiture of Criminal Property: Legal Measures for Targeting the Proceeds of Crime[M]. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. 2009: 42.
  • 4Stefim D. Cassella. Criminal Forfeiture Procedure in 2009: An A,mual Survey of 1)evelopments in the Case Law. 45 No. 4 Crim. Law Bulletin ART 1.
  • 5克劳思·罗科信.刑事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2003..
  • 6Donald J. Kochan, Retirming Property Forfeiture Laws to Protect Citizens' Rights[EB/OL].(2()0q-06-O5)/J2t)12-5 - 10] http : //www.mackinac.org/archives/1 c)qS/s 1098-03.

共引文献91

同被引文献74

引证文献5

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部