摘要
长期以来,建构主义STS与科技政策研究传统之间形成了相互分离、相互不信任的局面。而韦伯斯特则提出了"服务型STS"理念,强调STS研究者应树立"决策服务",进入"政策之屋",力图打破STS与科技政策研究之间的栅栏。"服务型STS"理论引起了学界的广泛论争,温、诺沃特尼与韦伯斯特就政策之屋内STS所应扮演的角色、服务型STS与学术型STS之间的关系等问题展开了一系列对话与博弈。针对论争,从"STS是否有必要进入政策之屋"、"STS的服务对象是谁"、"STS应采取何种策略与决策者对话"三个方面进行分析,提出未来STS应进入社会实践场这一观念。
For a long time, there is a mutual separation and distrust situation between constructivism STS and research science and technology policy research domain. But Webster has put forward the idea of ＂service-oriented STS＂, emphasizing that the STS researchers should have the consciousness of ＂decision-making service＂ and enter into ＂policy room＂. He tries to break the fence between science and technology policy research and constructivism STS. ＂Service-oriented STS＂ theory has aroused widespread academic debate, around the issues of the what role that STS researchers should take in the policy room, the relation between academic STS and Service-oriented STS, Brian Martin, Nowotny and Webster have made a series of debates. How to consider about those debates？ The article gives its answer from the following three aspects of whether is it necessary for STS to enter policy room, who are the service objects of STS, what strategies that STS should take when having dialogues with policy makers. At last, the article puts forward the idea that STS should go into social practice field in the fmure.
出处
《保定学院学报》
2013年第4期19-24,共6页
Journal of Baoding University
关键词
服务型STS
学术型STS
政策之屋
参与
决策服务
service-oriented STS
academic STS
policy room
engagement
decision-making service
