摘要
2012年《黑龙江省气候资源探测和保护条例》的出台引起了民众广泛的质疑和反对,也引发了学界广泛的关注。我们每天都接触的气候资源是否是属于自然资源呢?是否能作为物权的客体——物呢?是否符合所有权的设定条件呢?如果符合,那采用何种所有权模式会更为合适呢?笔者由《黑龙江省气候资源探测和保护条例》的出台引发了以上几个问题的思考,谈了自己的一点浅见,认为气候资源属于自然资源,并且可以作为物权的客体——物,也符合所有权设定的条件,采用国家所有权模式更有利于气候资源的开发和保护。
The introducing of 《The Climate Resources Detection and protection regulations of Heilongjiang Province》in 2012 caused the common people＇ s widespread doubt and opposition. This also caused the widespread attention in educational circles. The climate resource we touch every day is very normal. Does it belong to the natural resource？ Can it be the object of the Real Right？ Does it fit to the setting condition of the Proprietary Right？ If yes, then which mode will be more suitable？ The author has the above thinking from the introducing of ＂The Climate Resources Detection and protection regulations for Heilongjiang Province＂ , and gives some humble opinion. The author thinks the climate resource belongs to the natural resource, can be the object of the Real Right, and also fit to the setting condition of the Proprietary Right. It will be more conducive to the climate resource＇ s protection and permanent development by the mode of State Proprietary Right.
出处
《济宁学院学报》
2013年第4期113-117,共5页
Journal of Jining University
关键词
气候资源
所有权
自然资源
国家所有
climate resource
Proprietary Right
Natural resource
National ownership
