期刊文献+

论水资源法律调整模式及其变迁 被引量:12

On Development of Legal System to Regulating Water Resources
原文传递
导出
摘要 水资源法律地位的确立是罗马法制定水法制度的出发点,以公水和私水的划分为据,以民事权利为中心和以行政授权为中心的两套不同的水资源调整模式在罗马法时期已现雏形。19世纪末期以后,围绕公水、私水的基本分类而建立的传统水权法律制度也向现代水权转变。传统水权的调整规范主要是私法规范,其调整模式主要表现为水资源利用为中心的民事权利义务模式。行政水权、法定水役权以及可交易水权是以制定法形式存在的现代水权的典型形式。作为实现水资源可持续综合管理的一种法律手段而提出的可交易水权不同于完全自由水市场背景下的可交易水权,构建可交易水权所面临的最大挑战性问题在于:可交易水权如何能够在随着水文、气候变化而灵活调整的同时仍然满足稳定性、安全性等交易特性,这同时也是构造可交易水权制度的重中之重。 The nature of water resources was the first step for Roman's water rights system. Two different ways of defining public water and private water has marked the distinction of two different water resources distribution model since the time of Roman law; one concentrating on civil rights while the other focusing on discretionary powers. Traditional water rights, which are structured according to basic classifications between public waters and private waters, has been evolving towards contemporary water rights since late nineteenth century. The rules of the traditional water rights took the form of a set of rights, duties and liabilities, concentrating on water resources use. Discretionary water rights, statutory usufructuary rights and tradable water rights are three typical models of contemporary water rights in statutory regimes. Tradable water rights, as a legal instrument of sustainable water resource management, are different from those under entirely free water markets. The biggest challenge facing the proposed tradable water is: how can it be flexible to changes in climate, and still satisfy stability, safety and other features of trading, rlhis is also the main focus point in constructing tradable water rights legal structure.
作者 裴丽萍
出处 《法学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期100-108,共9页 The Jurist
关键词 公水 私水 传统水权 现代水权 可交易水权 Public water Private water Traditional water rights Contemporary water rights Tradable water rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Dante A. Caponera, 1992, Principles of Water Law and Administration, A.A Balkema Publishers, Netherlands, pp.65-66,79,77.
  • 2法国水法,载水信息网.http://www.hwcc.com.cn.
  • 3费安玲,丁玫译.《意大利民法典》,第840条,第909条,第912条.
  • 4Embrey v Owen (1851) 6 Exch 353. 转引自D E Fisher, 2000 Water Law, LBC lnformation Services, pp65.
  • 5Allen v United Carpet Mills Pry Ltd (1989) VR 323 per Nathan J.
  • 6D E Fisher, 2000 Water Law, LBC Infoimalion Services, pp64.
  • 7Richard Bartlett "A Comparative of Crown Right and Private Right to Water in Western Australia: Ownership, Riparian Right and Groundwater." The University of Western Australia, 1997, pp45-46.
  • 8Poh-Ling Tan, "Legal Issues Relating to Water Use", pp.18.
  • 9瑞士民法典第709条.
  • 10殷生根,王燕译.《瑞士瓦法典》.中国政法大学出版社1999年版.

共引文献4

同被引文献165

引证文献12

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部