摘要
嘉靖大礼议的既有研究往往将大礼议演绎成阁权与皇权的角力、改革派与保守派的对抗、程朱理学与阳明心学的斗争。然而,在处理与大礼议关联紧密的张延龄案时,世宗及议礼新贵的话语、行为揭示了他们对大礼议的认知与上述观点颇为不同。在世宗看来,他与张太后的矛盾是大礼议及其余波的主要矛盾,他衡量支持者与反对者的标准在于是否迎合他尊崇本生父母的意愿,是否能够与张太后脱离干系;议礼新贵清楚地认识到,大礼议的胜利在使张太后失去圣母身份的同时也使世宗与他们自己陷入了道德困境。他们主张给予张太后高于世宗生母的礼遇,制造人伦、正统各有所归的假象,极力阻止世宗族诛张氏家族正是为了维持上述假象以期规避为天下、后世所不齿的道德风险。与此同时,京师游民刘东山等人诬告张太后胞弟张延龄及其家族的行动与相关供词,显示在议礼余波中即使是生活在社会底层的人亦能准确地察觉到世宗对张太后的敌意。
Previous studies on the Big Etiquette Event （Emperor Jia Jing suppressed those who objected to his idea and action to endorse as late emperor his father who had been son of a concubine） have generally regarded it as conflicts between the cabinet power and emperor power, the reformative party and the conservative party, and ZHU Xin＇s philosophy and Yangming＇s philosophy. However, the respective discourses and behaviors of the Emperor and the then upstarts reveal that the Event resulted from rather different views about the Big Etiquette Event. From the perspective of the Emperor, his con- flict with Queen Mother Zhang was the principal one arising from the Event and its afterwinds., his criterion for judging sup- porters and objectors lied in whether they catered for his willing to endorse his biological parents and whether he could go free from Queen Mother Zhang who adopted him. The afterwinds were well aware of the fact that the victory of the Event deprived Zhang＇s due status but at the same time drove the Emperor into a moral embarrassment. They advocated that Zhang should have a higher position than the Emperor＇s own parents. The school of the latter then received severe punish- ment.
出处
《北京师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第4期87-94,共8页
Journal of Beijing Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词
明代
张延龄案
大礼议
Ming Dynasty
the case of ZHANG Yan-ling
the Big Etiquette event
