摘要
饲养关系并不是衡量饲养动物损害责任的最佳途径,饲养人或管理人对饲养动物的控制和管理义务才是损害责任的渊源。无过错责任原则有利于受害人得到救济,但其并非是弘扬社会道德和伸张公平正义的唯一途径。动物园动物致害的规定造成了归责体系中的不平衡,同时也揭示了完全遵循无过错责任原则的不足。最理想的规范是在区分动物类型的基础上,使危险动物的饲养人承担无过错责任,而对非危险动物致害适用过错推定责任。即使不宜对现有法律作出较大修改,人民法院在审判过程中也应根据案件事实,适度扩大解释免责条款的范围,以避免硬性适用无过错责任原则所产生的不公正判决。
The duty of controlling and supervising animals,rather than ownership,is the best measure to infer liability.The victims are much easier to sue for damages with the doctrine of no-fault liability,but it is not the only way to uphold social morals and justice.The rule of liability for harm caused by zoo animals breaks the balance of imputation system and shows the defect of no-fault liability doctrine.It would be better that the law imposes no-fault liability on dangerous animal owners,while does presumption of fault doctrine on non-dangerous animal owners.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第4期153-160,共8页
Legal Forum
关键词
饲养动物损害责任
无过错责任
过错推定责任
liability for animals
no-fault liability
presumption of fault liability
