期刊文献+

学习理论的世纪反思与前瞻 被引量:4

On the Centennial Reflections of Learning Theories and New Outlooks
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 学习理论的蓬勃发展内在地要求进行自觉地反思,从而在更高的层面上促进学习理论的整合与发展。我们重新考察"学习"的本质,发现其具有人性基础、时序性、动态发展性、价值性以及伦理性,每一特性又包含着相反相成的两个方面。回望学习理论发展的历程,行为主义、认知主义和建构主义等学习理论的发展也深刻地反映了学习本质的各对范畴。展望未来,学习理论正朝着交互式复杂而开放的系统迈进,从机制研究走向拓展应用研究,从单一水平走向多水平,从一维的研究走向多维的研究。 The prosperous development of learning theories requires reflection which will boost the in- tegration of learning theories. When reconsidering the nature of "learning", we will find out it is connected with human nature, time-order, dynamic development, value and ethics. Each nature contains two opposite and complementary aspects. In terms of the evolution of learning theories, new theories such as Behavior- ism, Cognitivism and Constructivism all reflect the categories of the nature of learning. Right now, the development of learning theory is heading for a complex and open interactive system, moving from institutional study to extended application studies, from single level to multi-levels, from uni-dimensional to multidimensional.
作者 左璜
出处 《徐州工程学院学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第4期99-104,共6页 Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 中国博士后面上资助基金项目"网络化学习哲学视角下的大学教师教学发展研究"(2013M531858) 全国教育科学"十二五"规划2012年度教育部青年专项课题"以‘卓越教师’为导向的师范生信息化教学能力模型建构及其影响因素多层分析"(EIA120397)
关键词 学习理论 交互式复杂系统 学习机制理论 学习应用理论 learning theories interactive complicated system theory of learning mechanism theory of learning application
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1SALJOR.Learning, Theories of Learning, and Units of Analysis in Rese&rch[J]. Educational Psychologist, 2009 , 44 (3):202-208.
  • 2BOWERG H, HILGARD E R. Theories of learning[M]. London: Prentice-Hall, 1981 : 11.
  • 3熊哲宏,匡春英.论当代“天赋论”对儿童研究方法学的挑战[J].齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2002(3):1-4. 被引量:1
  • 4ALEXANDER P A, SCHALLERT D L, REYNOLDS R E. What is learning anyway. A Topographical Perspective Consid-ered[J], Educational Psychologist,2009 ,44(3) : 176-192.
  • 5STANOVICHK E. Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy[J].Reading Research Quarterly, 1986(21) :360-407.
  • 6申仁洪,黄甫全.合作活动学习刍论[J].教育研究,2004,25(10):60-63. 被引量:32
  • 7REBERAS. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 1989,118(3) :219-235.
  • 8C1LEMENTSW A,Perner J. Implicit understanding of belief[J]. Cognitive Development, 1994.9(4) : 377-395.
  • 9MATHEWSR C. Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect[J]. Journal of Ex-perimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 1989,15(6) : 1083-1100.
  • 10郭秀艳,杨治良,周颖.意识-无意识成分贡献的权衡现象——非文字再认条件下[J].心理学报,2003,35(4):441-446. 被引量:29

二级参考文献43

共引文献1147

同被引文献26

  • 1靖国平.“重视个性的原则”与日本第三次教育改革[J].比较教育研究,1990(2):37-39. 被引量:3
  • 2崔金赋.个性发展与个性化教育[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1996,28(5):21-26. 被引量:13
  • 3加达默尔.《真理与方法》.洪汉鼎泽.上海:上海译文出版社,1999年,第185-186页.
  • 4徐盛桓.相邻关系视角下的双及物句再研究[J].外语教学与研究,2007,39(4):253-260. 被引量:56
  • 5Sternberg, J. Cognitive Psychology (6th Edition). California: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011:1-6.
  • 6Robert, L. , Kimbelly , M. Cognitive Psychology. Boston: Pelson Education,lnc,2008: 216.
  • 7Eysenck, N., Keane, N. Cognitive Psychology. New York: Psychology Press Ltd,2005:35.
  • 8Lusting, C. , Hasher, L. Implicit memory is Vulnerable to Proactive Interference. American Psychological Society, 2001, 12:408- 412.
  • 9lsurin, L. Reuoactive Interference from Translation Equivalents: Implications for First Language Forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 2001 , 2:312 - 319.
  • 10Cmmichael, M. Manual of Child Psychology (3rd Edition). New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1970:45 46.

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部