期刊文献+

国产替考拉宁治疗革兰阳性球菌重症肺炎疗效分析 被引量:7

Domestic teicoplanin in treatment of severe pneumonia caused by gram-positive cocci
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的临床观察国产替考拉宁治疗革兰阳性球菌所致的重症肺炎疗效和不良反应以及细菌清除率。方法对青岛大学医学院附属医院2008年8月-2011年8月被确诊为革兰阳性球菌重症肺炎36例住院患者,应用国产替考拉宁治疗,疗程10~14d,并进行临床疗效、细菌清除率及不良反应的比对分析。结果痰培养共检出耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)25株,耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌(MRSE)4株,耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(MRCNS)3株,血培养MRCNS 1株,深部静脉导管末端培养MRSA 2株,临床总有效率为88.89%,细菌清除率为77.78%;不良反应发生率为8.33%,不良反应发生率低。结论国产替考拉宁治疗革兰阳性球菌肺炎疗效确切、安全性高。 OBJECTIVE To observe the efficacy, adverse reactions, and the bacterial clearance rate of the domestic teicoplanin in the treatment of severe pneumonia caused by the gram-positive cocci. METHODS A total of 36 hospitalized patients with definite severe pneumonia caused by the gram-positive cocci were treated with domestic teicoplanin in the Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Qingdao University from Aug 2008 to Aug 2011. The duration of the treatment was 10~14 d. The therapeutic effect, bacterial clearance rate, and adverse reactions were compared. RESULTS There were totally 25 strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococus aureus (MRSA) cultured from the sputum specimens, 4 strains of methicillin-resistan Staphylococcus epiclermidis (MRSE), and 3 strains of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negatiae Staphylococcus (MRCNS), and there was I strain of MRCNS cultured from the blood. There were 2 cases with the deep venous catheter tip cultured for MRSA. The total clini- cal effective rate was 88.89%, the bacterial clearance rate was 77.78%, and the incidence of the adverse reactions was 8.33 %, which was low. CONCLUSION Domestic teicoplanin has accurate therapeutic effectiveness and is safe for the treatment of pneumonia caused by the gram-positive cocci.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期2977-2979,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基金 青岛市科技局资助项目(09-2-2-3-msh-5)
关键词 替考拉宁 革兰阳性球菌 重症肺炎 临床疗效 Teicoplanin Gram-positive cocci Severe pneumonia Clinical efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Feldman C,Anderson R.Bacteraemic pneumococcal pneumo-nia:current therapeutic options[J].Drugs,2011,71(2):131-153.
  • 2Watkins RR,David MZ,Salata RA.Current concepts on thevirulence mechanisms of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcusaureus[J].J Med Microbiol,2012,61(9):1179-1193.
  • 3Nimmo GR.USA300abroad:global spread of a virulent strainof community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcusaureus[J].Clin Microbiol Infect,2012,18(8):725-734.
  • 4Manfredi R,Sabbatani S.Novel pharmaceutical molecules a-gainst emerging resistant gram-positive cocci[J].Braz J InfectDis,2010,14(1):96-108.
  • 5Han SH,Chin BS,Lee HS,et al.Vancomycin-resistant en-terococci bacteremia:risk factors f or mortality and influenceof antimicrobial therapy on clinical outcome[J].J Infect,2009,58(3):182-190.
  • 6Cavalcanti AB,Goncalves AR,Almeida CS,et al.Teicoplaninversus vancomycin for proven or suspected infection[J].Co-chrane Database Syst Rev,2010,16(6):7-22.
  • 7Svetitsky S,Leibovici L,Paul M.Comparative efficacy andsafety of vancomycin versus teicoplanin:systematic reviewand meta-analysis[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2009,53(10):4069-4079.

同被引文献65

引证文献7

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部