期刊文献+

R2^*值对透明细胞肾癌术前病理分级的可行性研究 被引量:4

The R2^* Valuation in Assessing Preoperatively Histological Grade of CRCC: A Feasibility Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价R2*值术前划分透明细胞肾癌(CRCC)病理级别的可行性。方法回顾性分析26例CRCC患者的血氧水平依赖MRI结果,测量肿瘤实质部分的R2*值。使用组织学核分级法将所有肿瘤分级,在此基础上将所有患者分成低级别和高级别两个亚组。比较不同级别CRCC之间及高低级别组CRCC之间R2*值的差异。利用受试者工作特征曲线分析确定R2*值鉴别高低级别CRCC的阈值。R2*值与高低级别组CRCC之间行相关性分析。结果低级别组(Ⅰ+Ⅱ级)17例,高级别组(Ⅲ+Ⅳ级)9例。各级别CRCC之间R2*值存在明显差异(P=0.001)。高级别组R2*值明显高于低级别组(P=0.003)。R2*值为31.87 s-1时,敏感性为78%,特异性达到100%。R2*值与病理级别直接相关(P=0.002)。结论 R2*值作为一种无创的评价指标有助于CRCC的病理核分级。 Objective To assess whether R2^* values can be used to determine the nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinomas(CRCC).Methods Blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging(BOLD-MRI) of 26 patients with pathologically-proven CRCCs was retrospectively assessed.R2^* values were determined for the solid components of CRCC lesions.Histological nuclear grade was determined in each lesion.All patients were divided into low-and high-grade groups.R2^* values were compared between different grades and between low-and high-grade groups.Receiver operating characteristic curves were drawn to establish the cut-off point for R2^* values.The correlation between R2^* value and pathological grade was assessed.Results Low-grade group(Grade Ⅰ+Ⅱ) contains 17 cases and high-grade group(Grade Ⅲ+Ⅳ) contains 9 cases.Significant difference was seen between different grade groups(P=0.001).R2^* values of the high-grade group were higher than the low-grade group(P=0.003).A sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 100% were achieved with a cut-off of 31.87 s-1.R2^* values directly correlated with pathological grades(P=0.002).Conclusion R2^* values of CRCCs could be employed as a non-invasive biomarker to help classifying the nuclear grade of CRCC.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期680-683,共4页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 透明细胞肾癌 血氧水平依赖成像 磁共振 核分级 Clear cell renal cell carcinoma Blood oxygen level-dependent imaging Magnetic resonance imagin Nuclear grade
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Patard JJ, Leray E, Rioux-Lcclercq N, et al. Prognostic value of histo-logic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience. J Clin Oncol,2005,23:2763.
  • 2Schachter LR, Cookson MS, Chang SS, et al. Second prize : frequency of benign renal cortical tumors and histologic subtypes based on size in a contemporary series: what to tell our patients. J Endourol,2007, 21:819.
  • 3Breen DJ, Rutherford EE, Stedman B, et al. Management of renal tumors by image-guided radiofrequency ablation: experience in 105 tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2007,30:936.
  • 4Chen DY, Uzzo RG. Optimal management of localized renal cell car- cinoma : surgery, ablation, or active surveillance. J Natl Compr Canc Netw ,2009,7:635.
  • 5Sung HH, Park BK, Kim CK, et al. Comparison of percutaneous ra- diofrequency ablation and open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of size- and location-matched renal masses. Int J Hyperthermia, 2012,28:227.
  • 6Goyal A,Sharma R,Bhalla AS, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in re- nal cell carcinoma: a surrogate marker for predicting nuclear grade and histological subtype. Acta Radio1,2012,53 : 349.
  • 7Rosenkrantz AB, Niver BE, Fitzgerald EF, et al. Utility of the appar- ent diffusion coefficient for distinguishing clear cell renal cell carci- noma of low and high nuclear grade. AJR,2010,195:344.
  • 8Sadowski EA, Fain SB, Alford SK, et al. Assessment of acute renal transplant rejection with blood oxygen level-dependent MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology ,2005,236:911.
  • 9杨超,张奕,赵建农,何晓静,曾燕,舒健,吴伟.磁共振R_2~*值评估兔肝纤维化模型的初步实验研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2010,29(9):1257-1259. 被引量:8
  • 10Prasad P, Li LP, Halter S, et al. Evaluation of renal hypoxia in dia- betic mice by BOLD MRI. Invest Radiol,2010,45:819.

二级参考文献17

  • 1马春梅,郭启勇,廖伟,郭文力,于涛,冯国强.CT灌注成像在兔肝纤维化模型的研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(5):641-644. 被引量:23
  • 2杨学东,曹菊,王霄英,李晓玫,许玉峰,蒋学祥.3.0T磁共振大鼠肾脏血氧水平依赖成像的初步研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(6):809-811. 被引量:13
  • 3Peter AL,Bonis MD,Scott L,et al. Is liver fibrosis reversible? N Engl J Med,2001,344:452.
  • 4Batts KP, Ludwig J. Chronic hepatitis:An update on terminology and reporting. Am J Surg Pathol, 1995,19 : 1409.
  • 5Pauling L,Coryell CD. The magnetic properties and structure of the hemochromogens and related substances. Chemistry, 1936,22:159.
  • 6Ogawa S, Lee TM, Kay AR, et al. Brainmagnetic resonanceimaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Nail Acad Sei USA, 1990,87:9868.
  • 7Orrego H, Blendis LM, Crossley R, et al. Correlation of intrahepatic pressure with collagen in the Disse space and hepatomegaly in humans and in the rat. Gastroenterology, 1981,80:546.
  • 8Richter S, Mucke I, Menger MD, et al. Impact of intrinsic blood flow regulation in cirrhosis:maintenance hepatic arterial buffer response. Am J Physiol,2000 ,279 :454.
  • 9Benoit JN,Womack WA, Hernandez L, et al. Forward and backward flow mechanis ms of portal hypertension. Relative contributions in the rat model of portal vein stenosis. Gastroenterology, 1985,89:1092.
  • 10Bosch J, Pizcueta P, Feu F, et al. Pathophysiology of portal hypertension. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 1992,21:1.

共引文献7

同被引文献21

引证文献4

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部