期刊文献+

后腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的临床分析及手术新进展 被引量:4

Clinical Analysis of Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction and Surgery New Progress
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹膜后腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术治疗输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)的理论基础、手术技巧、临床效果及UPJO手术新进展。方法:回顾性分析经后腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗的46例UPJO患者的临床资料。结果:手术时间75~400min,平均186min;术中出血量5~30ml,平均20ml;术后住院时间6~20d,平均7.5d。围手术期尿漏2例,1例因术后吻合口出血导致,1例因术后护理不当夹闭尿管造成,均保守治疗治愈。45例术后随访肾积水及肾功能均得到改善,1例患者因肾积水加重再次行开放性肾盂成形术。结论:经后腹腹腔镜下离断性肾盂成形术治疗初发UPJO具有安全、成功率高、无腹腔并发症等优点,可以进一步的推广和应用。后腹腔镜肾盂成形术能否用于第二次肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的患者还需要进一步的探索。 Objective: To study theoretical basis, operation techniques and clinical effect for ureteropelvic junction obstruction by retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty and to study surgery new progress of UPJO. Method: The clinical data of 46 patients with UPJO who underwent retroperitonea] laparoscopic pyeloplasty were retrospectively analyzed. Result: The mean operating time was 186 minutes (range from 75 to 400 ), the mean blood loss was 20 ml ( range from 5 to 30 ), and the mean postoperative hospitalization days were 7.5 days ( range from 6 to 20 ) . Postoperative follow-up of hydronephrosis and renal function were improved. In peri operation period, two cases presented with urinary leakage, one because of postoperative anastomotic stoma bleeding, another improper nursing of closing catheter, two cases were cured by conservative treatment. 45 operations had been successful, hydronephrosis of one male patient was aggravated, which was operated by open pyeloplasty. Conclusion: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary UPJO has the advantages of security, high success rate and no abdominal complications etc, and can be further promotion and application. Whethearetroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelop]asty can be used for the second UPJO also needs further exploration.
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2013年第15期24-26,共3页 Medical Innovation of China
关键词 肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻 腹腔镜 肾盂成形术 手术新进展 Ureteropelvic junction obstruction Laporoscopy Pyeloplasty Surgery new progress
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Valero R J, Moanack J, Cruz G. Animal model for training inlaparoscopic pyeloplastyfj].Actas Urol Esp, 2012, 36 ( 1 ) :54-59.
  • 2Raza S J, Soomroo K Q, Ather M H. “Latex glove” laparoscopicpyeloplasty model:a novel method for simulated training[J].Urol J,2011,8 (4):283-286.
  • 3Chow K,Adeyoju A A. National practice and outcomes of laparoscopicpyeloplasty in the United.Kingdom[J].J Endourol, 2011,25 (4):657-662.
  • 4Lasmar M T,Castro H A, Vengjer A. Transperitoneal laparoscopicpyeloplasty :Brazilian initial experience with 55 cases[J].Int-Braz-J-Urol, 2010,36 ( 6 ) :678-684.
  • 5张旭,李宏召,马鑫,陈忠,郭小林,王少刚,李龙承,叶章群.后腹腔镜离断性肾盂成形术(附22例报告)[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2003,18(12):707-708. 被引量:66
  • 6Martina G R, Verze P, Giummelli P. A single institute, s experiencein retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty :results with86 consecutive patients[J].J Endourol,2011,25 ( 6 ) :999-1003.
  • 7Julian.R V, Mendonca R R, Meyer F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopicpyeloplasty:multicentric comparative study of techniques and accesses[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech-A, 2011,21 ( 5 ) :399-403.
  • 8Porpiglia F, Morra I,Bertolo R. Pure mini-laparoscopic transperitonealpyeloplasty in an adult population :feasibility,safety, and functionalresults after one year of follow-up[J].Urology, 2012, 79 ( 3 ) :728-732.
  • 9Garc la G E, Emmanuel T E, Navarro V P. Comparison of the operationtime and complications between conventional and robotic-assistedlaparoscopic pyeloplastyfj], Actas Urol Esp, 2011,35 ( 9) :523-528.
  • 10Noh P H, Defoor W R, Reddy P P. Percutaneous antegrade ureteralstent placement during pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopicpyeloplastyfj].J Endourol, 2011,25 (12):1847-1851.

二级参考文献11

  • 1[1]O'Reilly P H, Brooman P J, Mak S, et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int, 2001, 87:287-289.
  • 2[2]Cohen T D, Gross M B, Preminger G M. Long-term follow-up of Acucise incision of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and ureteral stricture. Urology, 1996, 47:317-323.
  • 3[3]Danuser H, Ackermann D K, Bohlen D. Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate. J Urol, 1998, 159:56-61.
  • 4[4]Gupta M, Tuncay O L, Smith A. Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: A 12-year experience. J Urol, 1997, 157:1613-1619.
  • 5[5]Bernado N, Smith A D. Endopyelotomy review. Arch Esp Urol, 1999, 52:541-548.
  • 6[6]Turk I A, Davis J W, Winkelmann B, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty-the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol, 2002, 42:268-275.
  • 7[7]Jarrett T W, Chan D Y, Charambura T C, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol, 2002, 167:1253-1256.
  • 8[8]Eden C G, Cahill D, Allen J D. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int, 2001, 88:526-531.
  • 9[9]Soulie M, Salomon L, Patard J J, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a multicenter study of 55 procedures. J Urol, 2001, 166:48-50.
  • 10[10]Ben Slama M R, Salomon L, Hoznek A, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: initial experience in 15 cases. Urology, 2000, 56:45-48.

共引文献65

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部