摘要
[目的]探讨医学生时间管理倾向与应对方式的关系。[方法]随机抽取广州中医药大学的161名大学生为研究对象,采用青少年时间管理倾向量表和应对方式问卷为工具进行调查。[结果]①大二医学生的时间效能感得分与大一、大三的医学生间差异有统计学意义(F=3.557,P<0.05)。②在求助因子上性别差异有统计学意义(t=-3.051,P<0.05)。③在退避因子上城乡差异有统计学意义(t=-2.510,P<0.05)。④解决问题与时间管理倾向正相关(P<0.01);自责与时间效能感、时间监控观及总分负相关(P<0.01);求助与时间监控观及总分正相关(P<0.05);幻想、合理化与时间效能感负相关(P<0.01);退避与时间效能感负相关(P<0.05)。[结论]时间管理较好的医学生倾向于使用积极的应对方式。
Objective It discusses the relationship between time management disposition and coping style. Methods This paper selected 161 students in Guangzhou Chinese Medicine University as the research objects in a random drawing, investigated by adolescence time management disposition scale（ATMD） and coping style questionnaire（CSQ）. Results （1） There was statistic significance in time efficacy scores between sophomore and freshmen, junior students （F=3.557, P〈0.05 ） . （2） There was statistic significance in seeking help factor between male and female （t= -3.051, P〈0.05 ） . （3） There was significant differences in retreat factor between urban and rural students （t= -2.510, P〈0.05 ）. （4） It was positive correlation between problem-solving and time management disposition （P〈0.01） , it was negative correlation among self-blame and time efficacy, time monitoring and total score （P〈0.01） , among seeking help factor, time monitoring and total score （P〈0.01） , among fantasy, rationalization and time efficacy （P〈0.01） , among retreat factor and time efficacy also （P〈 0.05 ） . Conclusions Better time management students tend to use active coping style.
出处
《卫生软科学》
2013年第5期293-295,共3页
Soft Science of Health
关键词
时间管理倾向
应对方式
人格特质
time management disposition
coping style
personality trait
