期刊文献+

科学使用科学咨询是提升决策公信力的关键——来自英国的经验启示 被引量:3

The scientific use of scientific advice is the key to enhance the credibility of decision-making: experiences and enlightenments from the UK
原文传递
导出
摘要 科学的、民主的公共决策流程可分为确定政策议题、制定具体政策、推行实施政策和评估修订政策四个环节。科学咨询贯穿于整个决策流程并成为确保决策质量和提高决策公信力的关键。当前我国公共决策急需一个关于如何科学使用科学咨询的宏观指导文件。本文介绍了英国科学办公室分别于1997、2000、2005、2010年颁布实施4版本有关科学咨询和政策制定的指导方针的概要情况,阐述了"英国经验"给我国公共决策机制改进带来的三点启示:一是尽早制定有关如何在公共决策过程中更好使用科学和工程咨询的规范性文件;二是明确相关管理机构;三是在决策实践中借鉴英国指导方针的部分核心理念、关键原则和有益做法。 The process of scientific and democratic public decision-making roughly includes four steps which are identifying policy issues,making specific policies,introducing and implementing policies,and evaluating and revising policies.Scientific advice exists in the entire process of decision-making,and is the key to ensure the quality of decision-making and improve the credibility of decision-making.China's public decision-making now urgently needs a macro guidelines on how to scientific use of scientific advice.This paper introduces the comprehensive situation of the UK promulgating and implementing the four versions of guidelines on scientific advice and policy making in 1997,2000,2005 and 2010.Based on enlightenments from UK's experiences,this paper gives three suggestions on improving the mechanism of China's public policy making.Firstly relevant departments need to develop guidelines on how to better use of scientific advice in policy making as early as possible.Secondly,regulatory agencies should be established.Thirdly some core concepts,key principles and good practices from the guidelines of the UK should be learned for decision-making practice.
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期496-503,共8页 Studies in Science of Science
关键词 科学咨询 公共决策 公信力 英国 经验 scientific advice public decision-making public credibility the United Kingdom experiences
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1帅学明.现代公共管理学[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2004.
  • 2贺德方.我国专家咨询制度发展的障碍与对策分析[J].中国软科学,2008(7):20-26. 被引量:18
  • 3陈玲,薛澜,赵静,林泽梁.后常态科学下的公共政策决策——以转基因水稻审批过程为例[J].科学学研究,2010,28(9):1281-1289. 被引量:27
  • 4赵正国.科学的不确定性与我国公共政策决策机制的改进[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2011,13(3):32-41. 被引量:10
  • 5英国上议院科学技术特别委员会.科学与社会:英国上议院科学技术特别委员会1999-2000年度第三报告[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社,2004.
  • 6Office of Science and Technology.The Use of ScientificAdvice in Policy Making[R].London.1997.
  • 7Office of Science and Technology.Guidelines 2000:Scien-tific Advice and Policy Making[R].London.2000.
  • 8Office of Science and Technology.Guidelines on Scien-tific Analysis in Policy Making[R].London.2005.
  • 9Government Office for Science.The Government ChiefScientific Adviser’s Guidelines on the Use of Scientificand Engineering Advice in Policy Making[R].Lon-don.2010.
  • 10Scientific advice and policy making:implementation ofguidelines 2000[EB/OL].http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file14479.pdf.2011-08-01.

二级参考文献31

共引文献52

同被引文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部