新认知语用学——语言的认知-社会研究取向被引量：67

Neo-cognitive Pragmatics:A Linguistic Cognitive-social Approach

导出

摘要认知语言学与社会语言学相结合产生了"认知社会语言学",认知语用学兼顾社会因素产生了"语用学的社会认知分析法"。通过深入考察这两个学科以及相关研究我们发现:紧密结合"认知"和"社会"两大要素将会成为21世纪语用学研究的重要方向,为此本文进一步提出了"新认知语言学"。其"新"主要体现在:有机整合社会和认知两大要素,且运用认知语言学的十几种认知方式,分析语用推理和会话含意,这也是对认知社会语言学和语用学的社会认知分析法的新发展。 The combination of Cognitive Linguistics with socio- linguistics has brought forth Cognitive Sociolinguistics （CSL）. Consideration given to both Cognitive Pragmatics and social fac- tors has led to Socio-cognitive Approach to Pragmatics （SCA）. Through the close investigation of these two disciplines and re- lated researches we have found that the close connection of cog- nitive and social factors will become an important direction for the development of pragmatics in the 21st Century. This paper, therefore, claims that it is necessary to propose the approach of ＂Neo-cognitive Pragmatics＂. It is ＂new＂ because the two ＂so- cial＂ and ＂cognitive＂ factors are organically integrated, and a dozen of cognitive strategies proposed by CL have been applied to the analysis of pragmatic inference and conversational impli- cature, which is also a new development of CSL and SCA.

作者王寅

机构地区四川外语学院外国语文研究中心

出处《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期1-4,共4页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

关键词认知社会语言学语用学的社会认知分析法新认知语用学认知方式 Cognitive Sociolinguistics Socio-cognitive Ap- proach to Pragmatics Neo-cognitive Pragmatics cognitive strat- egies

分类号 H0 [语言文字—语言学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1Austin, J. 1962. How to Do Things with Words[M]. Oxford : Claren- don Press.
2Brown, P. & S. Levinson. 1978. Universals in language usage:Polite- ness phenomena[ A]. In G. Esther (ed.). Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction [ C ]. Cambridge: CUP.
3Carnap. R. 1948. Rudolf Camap's analysis of "truth" : Reply [ J ]. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,9(2 ) :300 - 304.
4Chiarcos, C. , B. Claus. & M. Grabski. 2011. Salience: Multidiscipli- nary Perspectives on Its Function in Discourse [ M ]. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
5Geeraerts, D. , G. Kristiansen & Y. Peirsman. 2010. Advances in Cog- nitive Sociolinguistics[ M ]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
6Giora, R. 1997. Understanding figurative and literal language: The gra- ded salience hypothesis [ J ]. Cognitive Linguistics, (7) : 183 - 206.
7Giora, R. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context and Figurative Lan- guage [ M ]. Oxford: OUP.
8Grice, H. 1975. Logic and conversation [ A ]. In P. Cole & J. Morgan ( eds. ). Syntax and Semantics 3 : Speech Acts [ C ]. New York: Aca- demic Press.
9Habermas, J. 1981. Modernity versus postmodernity [ J ]. New Ger- man Critique, ( 22 ) :3 - 8.
10Harder, P. 2010. Meaning in Mind and Society( CLR 41 ) [ M ]. Ber-lin: Mouton de Gruyter.