期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术的临床比较 被引量:20

Comparison of laparoscopic and open approach for appendectomy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜与开腹手术切除阑尾的优缺点。方法:回顾性分析我院2010年1月1日—2012年3月31日292例行阑尾切除术患者的临床资料,根据手术方法分为单孔法腹腔镜阑尾手术组、多孔法腹腔镜阑尾手术组和开腹阑尾手术组,比较手术时间、出血量、术后排气时间、术后住院时间切口愈合等级及感染率。结果:单孔法腹腔镜阑尾手术组中1例转为多孔法,多孔法腹腔镜阑尾手术组中1例中转开腹,其余患者均完成手术。2例多孔法腹腔镜阑尾手术患者术后并发粘连性肠梗阻,经保守治疗后好转。与传统开腹手术相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术时间短、出血量少、术后排气快、术后住院时间短;对于急性单纯性阑尾炎,单孔腹腔镜手术比多孔法出血更少,瘢痕更小。结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术对腹部干扰少,单孔法切口更为隐蔽,在熟练掌握手术技术的前提下可以广泛应用。 Objective: To investigate laparoscopic technique in appendectomy. Method: Retrospectively analyze 292 patients, who underwent appendectomy for appendicitis from January 2010 to March 2012, for average operation time, bleeding quantity, recovery period, hospital stay and wound complications, group by pathology and operation methods. Result: One case of single-in- cision laparoscopic appendectomy was converted to multiple-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (LA)and one case of mutiple-incision LA was coverted to open appendectomy (OA).Two cases of multiple-incision LA complicated with intestinal obstruction and recovered after fluid treatment without surgical procedure. Co~,iusion: There were significant differences between LA and OA in operation time,hemorrhage,recovery period and hospital stay. Compared with multiple-incision LA,there was less hemorrhage in single-incision ones. Because of the umbilical cosmetic effect of sin- gle-incision technique, it is worth to exploring in clinical work.
出处 《中国现代普通外科进展》 CAS 2013年第2期131-133,137,共4页 Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
关键词 阑尾切除术 腹腔镜阑尾切除术 开腹阑尾切除术 Appendectomy· Laparoscopic appendectomy· Operation appendectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献19

  • 1钱锋,孙刚,唐波,王自强,石彦,赵永亮,罗华星,余佩武.腹腔镜胃癌根治手术的学习曲线[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(6):510-512. 被引量:46
  • 2Wilk PJ. Method for use in intra-abdominal surgery [J]. US Patent, 1994,(5): 297-536.
  • 3Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannalh SB, et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel app roach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2004, 60( 1 ):114-117.
  • 4Rattner D, Kalloo A, ASGE/SAGES Working Group. SAGES/ASGE working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery [J]. Surg Endosc, 2006,20(2):329-333.
  • 5Jagannath SB, Kantsevoy SV, Vaughn CA, et al. Peroral transgastrie endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine model[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2005,61 (3):449-453.
  • 6Park PO, Bergstr?mM, Ikeda K, et al. Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2005,61 (4):601-606.
  • 7Wagh MS, Merrifield BF, Thompson CC. Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in a porcine model[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2005,3(9):892-896.
  • 8Kantsevoy SV, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, et al. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy with survival in a porcine model [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2005,62 ( 2 ) :287-292.
  • 9Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta, et al. Surgery without scarsreport of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being [J]. Arch Surg, 2007,142(9):823-826.
  • 10Partecke LI,yon Bemstorff W,Karrasch A,et al.Unexpected findings on laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis:a pro for laparoscopic appendectomy as the standard procedure for acute appendicitis[J/OL].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2009[2010-05-21].http://www.springerlink.com/content/348077304414576.pdf.

共引文献488

同被引文献109

  • 1Roland Fernandes,Irshad Shaikh,Samer Doughan.Outcomes of elective laparoscopic colorectal operations in octogenarians at a district general hospital in South East England[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2013,5(1):9-11. 被引量:1
  • 2Chow A, Purkayastha S, Nehme J, et al. Single incision lapa- roscopic surgery for appendicectomy: a retrospective compar- ative analysis [J] .Surg Endosc,2010,24(10) :2567-2574.
  • 3Lee YS, Kim JH, Moon E J, et al. Comparative study on surgi- cal outcomes and operative costs of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in adult patients [ J ]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2009,19 (6) :493-496.
  • 4Lee J, Baek J, Kim W. Laparoscopic transumbilical single- port appendectomy: initial experience and comparison with three-port appendectomy [ J ]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percu- tan Tech,2010,20(2) :100-103.
  • 5Pez2011a A.Laparoscopic appendectomy[J].Ann Ital Chir,2012,83(3):253-257.
  • 6Gill RS, Shi X, A1-Adra DP, et al. Single-incision appendectomy is comparable to conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A systematic review and pooled analysis [ J ]. Surg Endosc ,2012,22 (4) :319-327.
  • 7Lee WS, Choi ST, Lee JN, et al. Single-port laparoscopic appendec- tomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: A prospective randomized controlled study [ J ]. Ann Surg,2013,257 ( 2 ) :214-218.
  • 8Suuronen S, Niskanen L, Paajanen rate during the era of statin use in F',et al. Declining eholecysteclomy Finland : a population-based cohort study between 1995 and 2009. Scand J Surg,2013. 102 (3) : 158 - 163.
  • 9Daly SC, Hooper EA, Rinewah D, el al. Resident training in single- incision compared with traditional cholecystectomy. JSLS, 2013, 17 (3) :361 -364.
  • 10Sasaki K, Watanabe G, Matsuda M, et al. Single-incision laparoscupic cholecystectomy: comparison analysis of feasibility and safely. Surg Laparnsc Endosc Pereutan Tech,2012,22 : 108 - 113.

引证文献20

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部