期刊文献+

腹腔镜对急性阑尾炎腹内感染患儿炎症因子水平和免疫功能的临床影响研究 被引量:56

Clinical effect of laparoscope on inflammatory factors levels and immune function of children with acute appendicitis intra-abdominal infections
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨腹腔镜及二氧化碳气腹对急性阑尾炎腹内感染患儿炎症因子水平和免疫功能的临床影响,为急性阑尾炎腹内感染的临床诊治提供依据。方法 选取2014年12月-2015年10月医院收治的急性阑尾炎腹内感染患儿88例,根据患者手术治疗分成研究组和对照组,各44例,研究组给予腹腔镜手术,对照组给予传统开腹手术,观察和比较两组患儿手术切口感染率、腹腔脓肿发生率、白细胞总数(WBC)、中性粒细胞(N)、淋巴细胞(L)计数、C-反应蛋白(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)等指标水平。结果 研究组患儿术后切口感染率和腹腔脓肿发生率分别为0和2.27%,低于对照组9.09%和18.18%;术后研究组患儿CRP和TNF-α水平分别为(23.98±17.34)mg/l和(1.11±0.34)ng/ml,低于对照组(39.07±19.35)mg/l和(1.54±0.64)ng/ml;术后研究组患儿WBC、N和L水平分别为(10.76±1.35)×10^9/L、(7.67±1.64)×10^9/L、(1.86±0.65)×10^9/L,低于对照组的(15.43±2.91)×10^9/L、(12.98±3.21)×10^9/L、(2.36±1.34)×10^9/L,且差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论 在临床手术治疗急性阑尾炎腹内感染的实践过程中,与开腹手术相比采用腹腔镜手术可有效控制患儿术后感染,改善患儿炎症因子和免疫功能,是临床手术过程中的理想选择。 OBJECTIVE To explore the clinical effects of laparoscope and carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on in‐flammatory factors levels and immune function of children with acute appendicitis intra‐abdominal infections so as to provide guidance for clinical diagnosis and treatment of the acute appendicitis intra‐abdominal infections . METHODS A total of 88 children with acute appendicitis intra‐abdominal infections who were treated in the hospi‐tal from Dec 2014 to Oct 2015 were enrolled in the study and divided into the study group and the control group ac‐cording to the surgical procedure ,with 44 cases in each group .The study group was treated with laparoscopic sur‐gery ,and the control group was given the conventional laparotomy .The incidence of surgical incision infection , incidence of intra‐abdominal abscess ,total white blood cell (WBC) counts ,neutrophils (N) ,and lymphocytes (L) counts as well as levels of C‐reactive protein (CRP) and tumor necrosis factor‐α(TNF‐α) were observed and com‐pared between the two groups of children .RESULTS The incidence of postoperative incision infection of the study group was 0% ,lower than 9 .09% of the control group;the incidence of intra‐abdominal abscess of the study group was 2 .27% ,lower than 18 .18% of the control group .The postoperative CRP level of the study group was (23 .98 ± 17 .34)mg/l ,lower than (39 .07 ± 19 .35)mg/l of the control group ;the postoperative TNF‐αlevel of the study group was (1 .11 ± 0 .34)ng/ml ,lower than (1 .54 ± 0 .64)ng/ml of the control group .The postoperative WBC level of the study group was (10 .76 ± 1 .35) × 10^9/L ,lower than (15 .43 ± 2 .91) × 10^9/L of the control group;the postoperative N level of the study group was (7 .67 ± 1 .64)× 10^9/L ,lower than (12 .98 ± 3 .21)× 10^9/L of the control group;the postoperative L level of the study group was (1 .86 ± 0 .65)× 10^9/L ,lower than (2 .36 ± 1 .34)× 10^9/L of the control group ,and there was significant difference (P〈0 .05) .CONCLUSION As com‐pared with the laparotomy ,the laparoscopic surgery can effectively control the postoperative infection and improve the inflammatory factors and immune function of the children with acute appendicitis intra‐abdominal infection , and it is an ideal surgical procedure .
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第22期5213-5215,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基金 浙江省医药卫生科技计划基金资助项目(2013KYA192) 宁波科技局一般课题基金资助项目(2010A21)
关键词 腹腔镜 二氧化碳气腹 急性阑尾炎腹内感染 炎症因子 免疫功能 Laparoscope Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum Acute appendicitis intra-abdominal infection In-flammatory factor Immune function
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1邝学军,彭钊,王建钧.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术后手术部位感染的临床对比分析[J].湘南学院学报(医学版),2013,15(2):12-16. 被引量:10
  • 2Gregory S,Kuntz K,Sainfort F,et al.Cost-effectiveness of integrating a clinical decision rule and staged imaging protocol for diagnosis of appendicitis[J].Value Health,2016,19(1):28-35.
  • 3Hong HS,Cho HS,Woo JY,et al.Intra-appendiceal air at CT:is it a useful or a confusing sign for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis?[J].Korean J Radiol,2016,17(1):39-46.
  • 4Kim HS,Kang WK,Chung DJ.Appendiceal immunoglobulin G4-related disease mimicking appendiceal tumor or appendicitis:a case report[J].Korean J Radiol,2016,17(1):56-58.
  • 5Waxman BP.Treating uncomplicated appendicitis without surgery:will computer tomography scans and antibiotics triumph over clinical acumen and surgical dogma?[J].ANZ J Surg,2015,85(11):800.
  • 6Manenti A,Pavesi E,Farinetti A,et al.Re:Portal biliopathy:multidisciplinary management and outcomes of treatment[J].ANZ J Surg,2016,86(1-2):105-106.
  • 7陈付伟,申国敏,雷素斌.腹腔镜阑尾切除戳孔感染的临床分析[J].中国医药科学,2015,5(4):150-151. 被引量:5
  • 8Darwazeh G,Cunningham SC,Kowdley GC.A Systematic review of perforated appendicitis and phlegmon:interval appendectomy or wait-and-see[J].Am Surg,2016,82(1):11-15.
  • 9Omiya K,Ikemoto K,Uchida M,et al.Anesthesia for a patient with acute appendicitis and idiopathic cervical internal carotid artery vasospasms[J].Masui,2015,64(12):1264-1268.
  • 10Schuppisser M,Khallouf J,Abbassi Z,et al.Abdominal mondor disease mimicking acute appendicitis[J].Int J Surg Case Rep,2016(20):37-40.

二级参考文献27

  • 1中华医学会外科分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组.腹腔镜阑尾切除术常规[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2006,11(4):359-360. 被引量:117
  • 2Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy [J] . Endoscopy, 1983, 15(2):59-64.
  • 3Yaghoubian A,Kaji AH, Lee SL. Laparoscopic versus Open Ap-pendectomy :Outcomes Analysis[j] . Am Surg, 2012 , 78(10):1083 - 1086.
  • 4Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versusopen surgery for suspected appendicitis [j] ? Cochrane DatabaseSyst Rev, 2010, 6(10) :CD001546.
  • 5Mehrabi M, Jangjoo A, Amouzeshi A,et al. Wound infectionincidence in patients with simple and gangrenous or perforatedappendicitis[j] ? Arch Iran Med, 2010,13( 1) : 13 ~ 16.
  • 6Yaghoubian A,Kaji AH, Lee SL. Laparoscopic versus Open Ap-pendectomy: Outcomes Analysis[ J]. Am Sui^, 2012, 78(10):1083 - 1086.
  • 7Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M. Choice of approach for appen-dectomy :a meta- analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendec-tomy[ J] ? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2007, 17(4):245-255.
  • 8Wei HB, Huang JL, Zheng ZH, et al. Laparoscopic versusopen appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison[ j].Surg Endosc, 2010 , 24(2) :266 - 269.
  • 9Lim SG, Ahn EJ, Kim SY, et al. A clinical comparison of lap-aroscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis[j]. J Korean Soc Coloproctol, 2011,27(6) :293 - 297.
  • 10Gupta R, Sample C, Bamehriz F, et al. Infectious complica-tions following laparoscopic appendectomy [ J ] . Can J Surg,2006 , 49(6):397 - 400.

共引文献13

同被引文献407

引证文献56

二级引证文献503

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部