摘要
目的比较冰冻血小板和新制备的血小板的在临床上的应用效果。方法选268例新制备的血小板与296例冰冻的血小板输注病例,观察两组输注血小板前后的临床表现并进行血小板的计数。结果在564例病案中,输注新制备血小板后的患者外周血血小板上升的程度和总有效率明显高于输注冰冻血小板的患者,两者之间差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论输注新鲜血小板或冰冻血小板均能达到控制及预防出血的治疗作用,并且提升机体血小板数值,虽然新鲜血小板的疗效优于冰冻血小板,但冰冻血小板可以在抢救危重患者时代替机采新鲜血小板。
Objective To explore the clinical effect of transfusion of frozen apheresis platelets in order to make up the deficiency of fresh apheresis platelets during the emergency rescue. Methods Patients were randomly allocated into two groups receiving transfusion of fresh or fro- zen apheresis platelets. The clinical efficacy and increment of platelet count before and after transfusion of apheresis platelets were compared between these two groups. Results After transfusion of platelets, the clinical efficacy and increment of platelet count were raised in these two groups, and their difference was significant （ P 〈 0.05 ）. In 564 cases, the increment of platelet count after transfusion of fresh apheresis platelets was much higher than that with frozen apheresis platelets, and the difference between these two groups waS significant （ P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion The transfusion of fresh or frozen apheresis platelets can control and prevent the bleeding and increase the number of platelet count. Although the efficacy of fresh apheresis platelets is better than that of frozen apheresis platelets, but transfusion of frozen apheresis platelets can replace fresh apheresis platelets in rescue of critically ill patients.
出处
《临床和实验医学杂志》
2013年第1期26-27,共2页
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
关键词
新鲜血小板
冰冻血小板
疗效
Fresh apheresis platelets
Frozen apheresis platelets
Effect
